Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, I have a E30 BMW with a Nissan SR20DET. I recently replaced the weak open wheel BMW diff with a second hand R32 Skyline LSD diff. To put it in I had to get a new 3" single piece tailshaft made up, two new Mazda half shafts, new Magna outer CV's, and the original R32 inner CV's.

Now between 3-4000 RPM (~110kmh) there is a horrid shudder that shakes the whole car and you can feel it most through the seat of you pants.

Now, since it's all new and most of it custom it's proving difficult to track down what's causing it. The place that made the driveshaft had a look at it and ran a dial guage over everything and couldn't see what could be causing it, so suggested the diff could be the problem.

I have replaced the rear wheels and tyres, same problem...

Removed left hand half shaft, same problem...

Remover right hand half shaft, same problem...

All that's left is tailshaft and diff so I have two questions:

1. Has aonyone had this sort of problem with their diff?

2. Does anyone in Brisbane have a known good R32 LSD diff with 4.1 ratio that they would like to sell on the basis that it is the diff at fault (ie, I pay you after I fit your diff and problem goes away, or I give it back if it doesn't :)

Any opinions?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98650-please-help-me-with-a-diff-problem/
Share on other sites

It's unlikely to be the diff, BUT if the input pinion bearings are shagged it could cause the tailshaft to float around sufficiently to cause this sort of problem. I've never seen an R200 that was that bad and usually they get quite noisy well beforehand. A badly worn slipjoint at the gearbox can give a similar problem, although in that case oil leaks preceed other signs.

To me it sounds like tailshaft whip, which can occur when there is too much 'offset' between the connection of the tailshaft to the gearbox and its connection to the diff. IOW the imaginary line drawn between the centre of the gearbox to the centre of the diff should be as straight as possible. Shimming the gearbox mount can help but it depends on which way you need to go.

I had a similar problem with an Oz spec R31 Skyline sedan when I replace the tailshaft with a single piece unit that was quite long. Had bad shudders at similar speeds to yours and ended up modifying the gearbox mount. The problem is still there but nowhere near as great.

Generally the longer the tailshaft the more sensitive it will be.

Edited by SteveL

the R31s are well knowen for the sort problem it sound like you might have, the tail shafts throw the balance weights off & @ around 80 too 100 k it shudders might be worth taking the shaft out & have it balanced....

I can't detect any movement/play at either the gearbox or pinion end. I first thought whip, but the gearbox and pinion are pretty well lined up. The rotational speed of the driveshaft is only about 4000rpm and they guaranteed no problems up to 9000rpm. I also can't detect any significant vibration from the gear leaver (I expect I would if it was the tailshaft whipping).

If I can't get a diff to try I guess I can take it to a diff lapping place and get them to inspect the internals of the diff, if it's all OK, I will take the tailshaft to some where else to have it inspected/rebalanced.

Ahh, the cost of doing something different...

the R31s are well knowen for the sort problem it sound like you might have, the tail shafts throw the balance weights off & @ around 80 too 100 k it shudders might be worth taking the shaft out & have it balanced....

I took it out last night, it's still got the weight on it, and it's brand new so it should be balanced...

Uni joints. I had the same prob with mine when I got the rb25 box put in. We went to a 1 piece tailshaft. The place said the angle was too much, so we jacked the box up didnt help. Did a few other things. Then put it on a dyno. Shaft shacked to the s-house. Went back and said fix it. Low and behold they used cheap uni's. Had them replaced within about 3hours.

Thats my bet anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...