Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello there,

I am new to this forum, even to the Skyline. I just bought a 95 gts-t with an rb26 conversion. I live in Italy, but the car came from the UK. I drive the car and it just does not feel right. I wanted to know if anybody has doen this engine swap and what should be in the car and what shouldnt.

As I drive the car, it makes a wierd sound, I hear the turbos kicking in, however, they kick in at about 3000rpm, then the rpms shoot from about 4800 all the way to 7000 but no power or torque is being felt, its as if i am stepping on the clutch, boost goes to about 1.6bar, I am reaching 110 km in fifth gear since I feel that if I dont shift, the engine will blow, I had a turbo civic, so I know somewhat how the car should be feeling when the boost kicks in. Just this car does not feel like it has power.

Also, the engine looks like it is missing components, and there are various cables that are not connected to anything. I will post some pics of the engine bay so that you guys with alot more knowledge of this car can help me out. Please, I need help and there is no mechanic here that know about the skylines.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98803-i-need-help/
Share on other sites

lol. Sure you don't have a dead clutch? It rather sounds like it is slipping. The weird sound could also be the clutch. Dunno, i'm not really an expert, but i'm definately not a fan of conversions like that.

Interesting to see the pics though!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98803-i-need-help/#findComment-1798995
Share on other sites

post-25430-1134930876.jpgpost-25430-1134930966.jpgpost-25430-1134930876.jpgHere are the pics of my engine. One is the engine with open wires, another is of a hole or an intake pipe that has nothing attached to it elow one of the air intakes to the turbos.

The other sound it makes is when the turbos kickin, it sounds like gears grinding when I shift gears and the boost releases pressure, I dont believe that I have a bov and an external waste gate. Do you guys recommend this upgrade?

Thanks for your help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98803-i-need-help/#findComment-1800483
Share on other sites

THe 2 plugs are for the front and rear oxygen sensors for an rb26. the pipe i assume is for the standard BOVs which have probably been replaced with aftermarket, have a look along the intercooler piping for new BOVs.

Internal wastegate is fine for standard turbos.

If the 02 sensors are not connected you might have an aftermarket computer that doesnt use them (have a look in the passenger footwell). Or if you have the standard computer there might be an issue with the wiring and they left the sensors off.

Either way without 02 sensors you will get very poor fuel economy around town.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98803-i-need-help/#findComment-1805370
Share on other sites

If the clutch is going out, what kind of clutch should I replace it with? I hae the rb26 engine with an rb25 clutch and tranny

Some one had mentioned to me that a double or triple clutch would suffice using the same tranny. Is this true.

Here is a pic of my car

thanks

post-25430-1135108972.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98803-i-need-help/#findComment-1805676
Share on other sites

1.6bar is pretty high, so i'd imagine that it has a front-mount, new turbo, and so on... With that sort of power, you'd probably have to go for a clutch with very high clamping pressure. The twin and triple plate designs usually have a very strong pressure plate, so it could be the way to go. The downside is that these clutches are usually button-type (brass or ceramic). If you go that way, and it's your daily driver, see if you can source a kit that is a CUSHIONED button clutch. It gives the feel of a non-button, but mechanically it is on or off like a button clutch.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98803-i-need-help/#findComment-1805710
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I finally got to drive the car for some distance, pushed the car somewhat and drove the car around some good curves here in Italy pretty fast. When I arrived to my destination, I herd a weird noise comming from underneath of the car. Close to the rear wheels, it sounded like a high pitched noise constantly on It did not turn off until the car turned off. I have heard it before when I turn it on, however, this time it sounded louder. What could it be? Thank you for your help on the clutch issue, I have ordered a nismo twin plate clutch. Hopefully I should feel the power then..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98803-i-need-help/#findComment-1833507
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...