Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been thinking... Everyone is using S13 coilovers to get low and run meatier brakes.

I'm not huge on the idea of my car needing bigger brakes, but I would like to see it sitting slightly lower. I could do this via lower springs for my DR30 struts but maybe I could swap to standard S13 struts. I know that those who have swapped to S13 coilovers have said that they need to have the coilovers set almost as high as they will go yet their Skyline still sits really low. I'd assume thats because the S13 struts are shorter?

So will standard S13 struts fit in a DR30 using the same bits as the coilover conversion, and will the R32/R33 brakes fit on a standard strut the same as on the coilover?

Good idea but the problem is. The factory coil and seat on s13 struts are to large. And will rub on your rims. You would need a huge ofset to over come this.

Id love to know what i can do. I cannot afford coilovers. ect. But id like to have some good brakes and a 30mm drop in the front.

you can get your strut towers machined to accept a platform similar to a coilover setup....but if you have a look the platform on r30's is basically as low as it can be anyway....your ONLY options are lowered springs.....and coilovers.

lowered springs with matching shocks is fine and can handle great, you just need to get a decent branded set....i would not recommend pedders(bad experience)

as for brakes i think that early magna disks are the right offset?

and use 4pot hilux calipers(or 75series Landbruisers)

I would have to ask why you want the front so low ? You do realise that you screw up all the front geometry by having it low . Caster (radius) rods and the lower control arms effictively triangulate to form a lower wishbone joined to the Macpherson strut at the ball joint . When you lower the body you also lower the suspension location points and the geometry changes .

Firstly the lower control arms need to be higher at the cross member end in order to get some negative roll camber change . If they are horizontal at rest when the body rolls the arm scribes its arc upwards and inwards pulling the strut in with it giving positive camber change instead of negative . Not good .

Secondly the front of the caster rods are set to give the nose a degree of anti dive under deceleration and braking , dropping the nose reduces this so not only is it closer to the deck - its twice as likely to plow into it .

Do yourself a favour and leave the height std , fit slightly larger anti roll bars and something like the Noltec adjustable strut tops . Set the camber neutral and dial in as much positive caster as you can - I'm running +6 and turn in is the best I've ever seen on a strut car - with 205/55 16's . The front easily outgrips the back and it wears 225/50 16's .

Cheers A .

I would have to ask why you want the front so low ? You do realise that you screw up all the front geometry by having it low . Caster (radius) rods and the lower control arms effictively triangulate to form a lower wishbone joined to the Macpherson strut at the ball joint . When you lower the body you also lower the suspension location points and the geometry changes .

Firstly the lower control arms need to be higher at the cross member end in order to get some negative roll camber change . If they are horizontal at rest when the body rolls the arm scribes its arc upwards and inwards pulling the strut in with it giving positive camber change instead of negative . Not good .

Secondly the front of the caster rods are set to give the nose a degree of anti dive under deceleration and braking , dropping the nose reduces this so not only is it closer to the deck - its twice as likely to plow into it .

Do yourself a favour and leave the height std , fit slightly larger anti roll bars and something like the Noltec adjustable strut tops . Set the camber neutral and dial in as much positive caster as you can - I'm running +6 and turn in is the best I've ever seen on a strut car - with 205/55 16's . The front easily outgrips the back and it wears 225/50 16's .

Cheers  A .

I would very much agree with this but it all depends on how far you are willing to go with your suspension. Not much of mine is still standard including mounting positions for a lot of things. B)

Adrian I know that standard height is pretty much optimum on the DRs, and I already have my front bar scraping everywhere, but it really does look like a 4wd compared to almost every other DR30 I see on the road.

I dont want super-low, just a tad lower. Its not like I'm a modifying nut, I've had it for over 2 years now and I havent even put a boost guage on it to see what standard boost is, let alone raised the boost. Maybe I'll just leave lowriding for the Triumph... Oh yes, that shall be loooooow

Adam when I stripped the Bluebird I had 4 good 205 50 16's to use up but was eternally greatfull to go back to 205 55 16's for more height and a more compliant ride . Depending on how you see it the increase in tyre diametre did sort of fill the front arches a little more but this was not the no 1 priority . I would never deliberatly buy 50 series tyres again at least in 205's or 215's .

Most cars of that era look nose high if the rails are parallel to the ground but thats because the body slopes forward not the floor pan . Also because the front end has the engine/auxilaries and transmission to support it needs to have more travel than the rear . When there is a rapid downward surge of all the front end mass there needs to be sufficient suspension travel for the spring and damper to control it . If the car is lower generally it hits the bump stops before the spring/damper can do its job . In my opinion you don't need to lower it to get it to handle . There are plenty of $100,000 + sports minded cars out there and they dont sit close to the ground .

Just for the record any strut that has the coil spring over the damper is a "coil over" . I would not be in any hurry to use Tien etc S13 bits and the spherical strut tops are a pain in the ass . Like I said , neutral camber , lots of positive caster , zero toe and you'll run rings around the doof doof wallys with 205 rubber . Wide tyres , low height and screwed up geometry - particularly with the wrong wheel offsets - doesn't work . Highly amusing rounding up some sickmobile with a standard appearing car . The bonus is its easy to live with on a daily basis and doesn't chop tyres out . Have you cake and eat it .

Cheers A .

Edit : What width rims and aspect ratio tyres do you run ?

Edited by discopotato03
I would very much agree with this but it all depends on how far you are willing to go with your suspension. Not much of mine is still standard including mounting positions for a lot of things. B)

If you do the rack and pinion conversion using a bluebird crossmember and S13 control arms and S13 tie rods, then wouldn't be a good thing to use S13 hubs and coilovers geometry wise?

Josh, is the rack and pinion conversion finished and on the road?? How did you sort out steering linkage? Any comments, problems?

Also, I just spoke to Barry at Datsport. If we can get 20 people interested (including bluebird guys) they said he can make a adjustable rear crossmember to suit DR30.

Cheers

import hr31 brakes are bigger and will lower the front by 40mm (someone else said that on this forum). i think all you need is the r31 inserts the r30 strut tops and the r31 brake lines?

the calipars are alot bigger and the rotors are 280mm plus they have a floating rotorso you can swap to the larger r32/r33 and even gtr brakes later (if you need too)...

The only R30 I ever saw with a rack used Bluebird (modified) struts and cut/shut Bluebird/R30 control arms . Steering was HEAVY though it did have shorter steering arms .

I have import Bluebird cross member and power rack but the DR is going on the market after rego in a couple of weeks so wont happen with me . I would have also cut/shut the control arms to suit the respective cross member and caster rod/ball joint .

S13 geometry is different because they used larger diametre springs and have less bump travel . You may find on a Bluebird or R30 that the bump travel is insufficient and droop travel excessive . Setting a reasonable ride heigh is only half the job . You can get better geometry from nearly std bits - need adjustable caster rods .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...