Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't see why a crank collar properly fitted would not be good enough for 500hp.  It costs half as much or less 'but I might as well throw $500 in the river since I'm rebuilding the engine anyway'.  Note sarcasm - not rudely meant, just easier to use.

Also those pistons will not likely be lighter will they?  More likely the opposite.  Dunno about the rods.

:P No offence taken. I don't really want to throw $500 away on anything either. It just seems to me that to go to all this trouble while the motor is out and so on, and then pop the 12yr old crank back in - which has had to be modified (possibly weakened at this point?) - in the scheme of things $500 was good insurance... but hey, that's exactly why I am asking the question - to see what others have done/think on this.

Pistons I thought were lighter going to the forged items over the stock cast ones -aren't they?

The crower rods are about 200g lighter than the stock rods. (recently another was done, and my engine builder weighed them both).. so all this means less stress on the crank I would think.

once you fit the collar etc its still gonna need to be machined before goin back into the motor.

thats where the new crank works out near enough to the same costings, without the wait of workshops :P

The weak point on that crank is the oil pump drive which the collar deals with.

How is the crank getting weaker with age? A new crank is never perfect anyway, it still needs some machining.

Also please note I tied your 500hp power figure to my statement.

Forged pistons are generally heavier than cast but you are making up for it with those rods - whether you need them or not is another story.

But I am not going as full on as someone building an outright race car either.

if this is so....you dont really need the motec and cdi....i have a brand new power fc pro which may suit your application better....could do a swap perhaps. pm me for a chat if your keen to work something out with me.

Edited by DiRTgarage
How is the crank getting weaker with age?  A new crank is never perfect anyway, it still needs some machining.

If cranks are anything like engine blocks, my understanding is that there are distinct advantages refreshing a used item from a metalurgy point of view, that is, the used item has already hardened and done any warping/etc.

Anyone more knowledgable then me (ha! that's not hard :)) care to comment?

The weak point on that crank is the oil pump drive which the collar deals with.

How is the crank getting weaker with age?  A new crank is never perfect anyway, it still needs some machining.

Also please note I tied your 500hp power figure to my statement.

Forged pistons are generally heavier than cast but you are making up for it with those rods - whether you need them or not is another story.

Fair enough. I suppose it was just my thought that perhaps the crank may have suffered some fatigue over that time. If not, and in keeping with what Lucien says about the metallurgy point of view - perhaps it is better to simply keep that one?

I'm all for saving the money if it really is no advantage.

if this is so....you dont really need the motec and cdi....i have a brand new power fc pro which may suit your application better....could do a swap perhaps. pm me for a chat if your keen to work something out with me.

:( Cheers for that, but I guess I meant I am not a "no limit to budget, out and out race car". I still intend to be 'racing' as much as I can.

Part of the reason I have Motec and CDI is because that what my tuner is most familiar with, and secondly - he sponsored me. :( He probably wouldn't like me to give it away like that. But thanks for the offer anyhow. Now if you want to swap a veilside front bar for that nice stock one you have - that's something I'd be interested in! :D

Forged pistons are generally heavier than cast but you are making up for it with those rods - whether you need them or not is another story.

I just weighed the stock pistons in at 440grams - and the JE replacements are 335grams according to the specs.

25% less, or 100grams per pot saving - using this particular piston. Got to be good.

Take another 200grams off per rod and the crank surely is having a better time of things at 8000rpm - not to mention the faster spin up time?

I just weighed the stock pistons in at 440grams - and the JE replacements are 335grams according to the specs.

25% less, or 100grams per pot saving - using this particular piston. Got to be good.

Take another 200grams off per rod and the crank surely is having a better time of things at 8000rpm - not to mention the faster spin up time?

I notice your using JE pistons what made you choose these?

I ask because I have a dilema of using JE's which I got at a good price or sourcing Weisco's which have teflon coating from the factory, which apparently are a closer fit and less noisy from cold start.

All advice appreciated.

Edited by Sinista32
I just weighed the stock pistons in at 440grams - and the JE replacements are 335grams according to the specs.

25% less, or 100grams per pot saving - using this particular piston. Got to be good.

Take another 200grams off per rod and the crank surely is having a better time of things at 8000rpm - not to mention the faster spin up time?

Well that's interesting. Has anyone got a pic of the JE piston lying around?

Do they have short skirts?

I went for the wiseco's recently for the abovementioned reasons basically. Teflon coated skirts from factory, clearances are smaller than some, fairly quiet compared to some, nice long skirts for keeping square in the bore, not expensive.

This weight saving says to me you have even less reason to get a new crank.

Just my opinion.

Well that's interesting.  Has anyone got a pic of the JE piston lying around?

Do they have short skirts?

I went for the wiseco's recently for the abovementioned reasons basically.  Teflon coated skirts from factory, clearances are smaller than some, fairly quiet compared to some, nice long skirts for keeping square in the bore, not expensive.

This weight saving says to me you have even less reason to get a new crank.

Just my opinion.

Yeah I hear what you're saying. Perhaps the JE are thinner and/or have shorter skirts. (I've always preferred shorts skirts.. not just in pistons either...)

I'll have to see if I can get hold of one and post some pics. I don't think the JE have any coatings like the Wiseco's either... I was thinking of having them ceramic coated - but thats just the top, not the skirts.. How much are the Wiseco's?

I notice your using JE pistons what made you choose these?

Frankly, it was just what my engine builder suggested. He's always had a like for the JE stuff. I once used them in a V8 too. But to be honest - I'm sure the Wiseco are probably just as good. And I like the sound of the teflon... I'll ask him about it and see what he thinks, but I know he did say that most 'good forged pistons' these days are all very good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh dear. The panel beating needs to be done before the filler work. Do you have a photo of the dent before you started? Hard enough to not flex and only hit the high spots?  What do you mean it was just temporary? 
    • Can u check this way it works for power supply?
    • These coils draw 10amps that what i read online
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation, think I understand now. I spent the better part of last night reading what I could about shuffle and potential solutions. I had replaced the OEM twin turbo pipe with an alternate Y pipe that is separated further away from the turbo. The current one is from HKS and I had a previous pipe that was separated even further away, both have shuffle. I had heard that a divider can be welded in to the OEM pipe to remove turbulence, and figure that aftermarket pipes that are more separated would achieve the same thing. From what I read, most people with -10 turbos get shuffle due to their size, though it's a bit less common with -5s on a standard RB26. I think Nismoid mentioned somewhere it's because OEM recirculation piping is common in Australia with -5 cars. It seems that the recommendation tends to vary between a few options, which I've ordered in what I think is most feasible for me:  1. Retune the MAP or boost controller to try to eliminate shuffle 2. Install OEM recirculation piping 3. Something called a 'balance pipe' welded onto the exhaust manifolds. I don't know if kits for this are available, seems like pure fabrication work 4. simply go single turbo My current layout is as follows: Garrett 2860 -5s HKS Racing Suction intake MAF delete pipes HKS racing chamber intake piping hard intercooler piping,  ARC intercooler HKS SSQV BOV and pipe Haltech 2500 elite ECU and boost solenoid/controller HPI dump pipes OEM exhaust manifolds HKS VCAM step 1 and supporting head modifications Built 2.6 bottom end All OEM recirculation piping was removed, relevant areas sealed off I'll keep an eye out for any alternative solutions but can get started with this.  Only other question is, does shuffle harm the turbo (or anything else)? It seems like some people say your turbo shafts will explode because of the opposing forces after a while and others say they just live with it and adjust their pedal foot accordingly. 
    • That worked out PERFECTLY! Thank you big time to JJ. He was able to swap me his stock diff. He drove all the way to me as well. Killer! Removal & install was pretty straightforward. The diff itself is HEAVY. So that’s a 2 man job.  Man does the car drive nice now! Couldn’t have worked out any better 👌
×
×
  • Create New...