Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 285
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Man those vids are schweeeet....... quick question thou... Any thoughts on how the KKR430 would perform on a RB25? You say the boost is great on the RB20.....just wondering if it would be a bit laggier on the RB25.....??

Man those vids are schweeeet....... quick question thou... Any thoughts on how the KKR430 would perform on a RB25? You say the boost is great on the RB20.....just wondering if it would be a bit laggier on the RB25.....??

I would of thought it would be less laggier. Though i think the KKR480 would be better suited. I think Otomoto state they have gotten 260rwkw (could be wrong lon this figure) from the 480 on an RB25 neo

Thanks guys, yeah was a typo with the KKR480 / KKR430. IObviously the KKR430 would be less laggier on the RB25 as it is a smaller turbz on a larger engine....

As replicate answered (cheers champ) was wondering about the KKR480 on the RB25 in a bit more detail than what is listed on their site....

KKR-480

Suitable for larger 2.5–3.0L engines, this turbo features a twin-entry T3-size exhaust flange, which is also suitable for normal T3-flange manifolds such as RB25DET or RB30ET*. Rated at 480hp, it uses the same compressor design as the KKR-430, but a larger turbine and housing better suited to high-boost applications up to 20psi. It uses a 2.75in V-band flange for the exhaust outlet.

Tested by Croydon Racing Developments on an RB25DET Neo engine, it produced 242kW at the wheels at 18psi. The standard internal wastegate is designed to hold 14–15psi.

Just trying to establish if the is much modification required to fit the KKR480 to the RB25 as there is for the KKR430 to the RB20.......

Pay an extra few $$$ and get a straight bolt-up Garret.......

Oh well such are the dilehmas of the 'turbo game'

Ando

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...