Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was reading up and came across that the cops are not able to

radar you whilst you are going down a hill.

I live in Vic

I coped a fine about a year ago for 120 in a 80 zone lost me lic for 6 months

but i was done whilst i was going down a hill!

Is it worth chaseing it up

would i be able to have it changed

has anyone been through this would like to hear!!!

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/100480-old-fine/
Share on other sites

If you were going to try and contest the fine on the grounds of radar location you would have had to of done when you had your time in court, but I still think you would have suffered the same fait. It’s not like we’re talking about 5km/h over here. I personally wouldn't bother try to do anything now, it would only become a burden of both your time and your finances. Sometimes you have to admit fault and take things like a man :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/100480-old-fine/#findComment-1833568
Share on other sites

If you were going to try and contest the fine on the grounds of radar location you would have had to of done when you had your time in court, but I still think you would have suffered the same fait. It’s not like we’re talking about 5km/h over here. I personally wouldn't bother try to do anything now, it would only become a burden of both your time and your finances. Sometimes you have to admit fault and take things like a man :)

you are right about speed cameras downhill, i dont know if it is worth chasing an old fine though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/100480-old-fine/#findComment-1839144
Share on other sites

going down a hill doesnt mean you can go any speed you want, you are still spose to stick to the speed limit.

i got my first speeding fine going down a hill in a 70km/h zone

speeding offences are strict liability offences - you dont need the fault element at all, just doing it is enough

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/100480-old-fine/#findComment-1842806
Share on other sites

The hill business isn't so much a rule, as a guideline, and it certainly wouldn't get you off going 40 over the limit.

Yes this is correct. The "rules" that u read about are just guidelines that police are given so that it does not look like they are just "revenue raising". These guidelines are just that, guidelines, not laws so u would have no case at all if u went to court.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/100480-old-fine/#findComment-1851792
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...