Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

I had a chat to a friend and showed him this thread. He has confirmed that it's a Volvo (S Series to be more precise).

A couple of things that give it away:

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1138114616.jpg

In this photo take note of the seat, then check out this photo of the current S50 ( http://www.volvocars.com.au/NR/rdonlyres/2..._604x314_08.jpg ) they have the same style seats.

Then, in this shot:

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1138114654.jpg

You can see that the external mirrors are the same as this:

http://www.volvocars.com.au/NR/rdonlyres/1..._604x314_08.jpg

And lastly, in that same photo above you can see the bonnet ridges are covered up by the car bra.

no its the new ve commo, just look at the door handles they are total the wrong style for volvo..........

tey are making the new handles the same style as the magna, and i know this cause we are makin them too

they have fitted a mock up gto front end to desguise the apperance of the car

Edited by 66 skyline gt

also if ya look hard the not even the right head ligths, look at the bottom of the had lights and you can see x-posed sheet metal, they have chucked different headlights in too fool you all, thats the art or camofalge for ya

no its the new ve commo, just look at the door handles they are total the wrong style for volvo..........

tey are making the new handles the same style as the magna, and i know this cause we are makin them too

they have fitted a mock up gto front end to desguise the apperance of the car

My source of information is quite credible.

I know for certain that it's not a VE Commodore, my source actually has direct involvement with prototype testing.

Its the New GTR!!

Jesus haha its bloody obvious its the new VE why would Volvo go to all the trouble to cover up their cars in oz in broken hill of all places?

Everybody that thinks its a volvo or camry or what ever is being sucked into thinking its a euro car, which is what they wanted by putting euro plates on it with BMW style front nose and LHD.

Edited by Shrub32
Its the New GTR!!

Jesus haha its bloody obvious its the new VE why would Volvo go to all the trouble to cover up their cars in oz in broken hill of all places?

Everybody that thinks its a volvo or camry or what ever is being sucked into thinking its a euro car, which is what they wanted by putting euro plates on it with BMW style front nose and LHD.

Unfortunately that's not the case.

Anyone can actually purchase Euro plates, so it's not really that hard to do.

The car isn't actually driven by anyone directly associated with Volvo.

The prototype vehicles are driven by people who specialize in the field of prototype testing and it's their obligation not to leave the car in a place that can be seen for extended periods of time. Obviously something they neglected to do when the photo was taken.

Prior to releasing vehicles in Australia, overseas manufacturers go to great lengths to test them in harsh Australian conditions, so it's no surprise that it has been via Broken Hill.

Either way, I can confirm that it's _not_ a VE Commodore.

Its the New GTR!!

Jesus haha its bloody obvious its the new VE why would Volvo go to all the trouble to cover up their cars in oz in broken hill of all places?

Everybody that thinks its a volvo or camry or what ever is being sucked into thinking its a euro car, which is what they wanted by putting euro plates on it with BMW style front nose and LHD.

i'm with him as i first stated

;)

cheers

i doubt its a volvo, it looks more like a commo. the rear lights are rounded like the current VZ; the light isnt grooved like the volvo as every1 makes it out to be, its only the fake plastic cover giving it the volvo headlight look.

Edited by r34_skyline

VE has my vote! I think its a VE, well will jsut have to wait for this pic to end up in a magazine with a proper right up, so we can put this debate to rest. I think the shape of the boot and the rear tail lights are very commodorey.

Thats my 2cents worth

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thank you, 100% the intent. New coils were due and the 17" sixers look/feel loads better than the stock wheels. The aero options are so spot on.   Thanks for the warm welcome, all!
    • 98 r34 gtt Been rocking my latest setup and car running like never before. Have put a good 200 miles on it since all the latest changes and additions. everything is dialed in and have been driving it a bunch.   However, all a sudden last weekend as soon as I pushed throttle passed 4k and the engine stumbles, (slow or fast acceleration) hesitates and doesn’t go above 4100 or so, like a misfire. Everything else seems fine. I had a “good” set of coil packs that I removed from car when I first got it when I changed them over to new coils. I swapped out current ones for those, but no change. I also changed the plugs, no change. Seems to rev over 4 when out of gear with no load just fine no “misfire”, but as soon as its in gear with a load of any kind, it “misfires” as soon as rpm drop back below 4 k it runs perfectly, smooth, starts, restarts and drives fine as long as I keep it below 4 k while in gear. All readings look fine, no CEL   Any idea as to what could all a sudden cause an issue when pushing rpms passed 4 k?
    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
×
×
  • Create New...