Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

depends what spec mate, post the full details of each your looking at.

Considering the GT42 can be ordered with any range of wheels and housings (as i bet a t66 can also) then its virtually a case of how long is the piece of string in this case as the question is too general

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103270-t66-or-gt42/#findComment-1898209
Share on other sites

The T66 is only rated at 700hp whereas the GT42R is rated at 800+...

T66 = old crap GT42R = new + improved design and twin ball bearing cartridge.

Also beware of cheap Chinese copies as many of these are circulating Ebay at the moment and are very very poor quality.

EDIT-R31Nismoid-you are not a trader, nor is FI a for sale section

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103270-t66-or-gt42/#findComment-1898982
Share on other sites

JVC the GT42/GT42R use either

94mm 56T (70.3mm inducer) compressor , max flow ~84lbs at ~ 22lbs boost

102mm 53T compressor , max flow ~ 95lbs at ~ 33lbs boost .

Compressor type for both is BCI-18 or GT series .

Turbine for both is 82mm 84T UHP or GT series .

The once Garrett T66 , rights were sold to Turbonetics , is

91mm 52T (65.5mm inducer) with max flow ~70lbs at ~ 25lbs boost .

I think these normally use TO4P trim (74mm 76T) turbines .

Garretts answer to the T66 was I think the TO4R compressor which is 84mm 63T and good for ~ 75lbs flow at ~ 26lbs boost .

The TO4R is said to be better spooling (lower boost threshold) than any of the above and judging by its major diametre and trim size it seems logical . The fact that its compact enough to fit in a TO4S compressor cover is a bonus . It is used in HKS's (rebadged Garrett) TO4R and TO4Z with TO4 P trim turbines and in bush bearing form just about any turbine practical ie T350 (75.5mm 70 or 76T) , TO4 O (74mm 69T) , TO4 P , TO4 GTQ (79mm 70T) , TO4 GTS (81.3mm 85T) and probably 82mm UHP turbine from the GT42 .

The Americans really like this TO4R compressor up to about 750-780 Hp as its efficient at low and high pressure ratios and not prone to surge . If you go searching for it they sometimes call it the GT67 wheel - they like to call compressors by their inducer diametre (66.7 = 67) for some strange reason .

There are some ball bearing alternatives to the TO4Z using it ie GT3567R and GT4067R which obviously use GT35 or GT40 BB UHP turbines in their native turbine housings .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103270-t66-or-gt42/#findComment-1901018
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...