Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heya all,

Just wondering what the quickest and cheapest way to 170rwkw is, bearing reliability in mind (as much as possible for an R32!) I think that's more than enough power for a 32, bearing in mind they come stock with 160kw at the motor!

Mine is pretty much stock now, power-wise, save for a catback exhaust and Apexi filter insert, and it already goes alright. So I think such a power-jump will be more than enough (being sensible about things).

I think the following would fit the bill:

3" Front Pipe and Dump Pipe (Probably the 'Flying Performance' style 2-in-1 job).

Standard Cat Convertor? (Do I need to change to hi-flow?)

3" Catback Exhaust with Turbo Muffler

R33 Turbo (Rebuilt)

Electronic Boost Controller (eg. Greddy Profec-B Spec II)

Fuel Computer (eg. Apexi SAFC-II)

Fuel Pump (eg Bosch 040)

Sports Intake Filter (Filter Insert in Stock Airbox)

Front Mount Intercooler (probably just a Hybrid Kit).

Let me know your thoughts on what else is needed, or on what is not needed, as you think fit. I think it's pretty spot on, but I figured the skyliners out there that are already pumping 170kw at the wheels would know better than me :P

Thanks,

Adrian.

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

That should just about do it. You can get away with just a regular old 3 inch cat as opposed to the metal cats.

There won't be a hell of a lot left in your injectors but it's easily do able.

To save a bit of money you could go a bleed valve.

Id also recomend a dr drift chip over an sfac, would be about the same price but its one less bit of gear for someone to nick out of your car, and its probably a better tune, plus takes off speed cut and boost cut etc.

And get a fuel regulator. That will give the injectors that bit more they might need.

To give you an idea I have just a front pipe back exaust, fuel reg and pump, pod with cold air, bleed valve set at 12psi and a dr drift chip and im making 155rwkw.

If you add the fmic, dump and r33 turbo (id say even not hiflowed) you should easy get 170rwkw.

from 160rwkw to 170...I think a boost controler is enough....just don't boost higher than 1 bar...0.9 shuld get that power already

umm you got 155rwkw? I thought Johny said stock has 160rwkw?

Edited by SKY 34

i got 170 with a 3" turbo back exhaust (no cat), r33 turbo, gtr fuel pump, hks pod and 1 bar boost

stock ecu and stuff, have remapped now.

with remap should get over 170 pretty easily, if you change your afm, my afm is now maxed out...

highly recommend dr drift

adja, u know the recipy....follow wat i had on my car and ul love it dude

Hey Nathan! What happened with that 33 you got? Surely you're not gonna get it on the road, it's too crazy.

Well, after hearing all the comments, I think the following is necessary to SAFELY provide for 170rwkw:

Fuel Pump

Fuel Pressure Regualtor

Air Flow Meter

Pod Filter Intake

R33 Turbo

Front Mount Intercooler

Front Pipe

Dump Pipe

High Flow Cat

Catback Exhaust

ECU

Boost Controller

Now I'm thinking this is all gonna cost a lot more than I wanted it to. Oh well, might have to do it a bit at a time. Save the boosting for last... see how I go.

Thanks for all your help,

Adrian.

Is this close enough to 170kw for you? :P

dyno002.jpg

mods to get there are:

Flying Performance 3" Front/Dump Pipe

3" High-Flow Cat

3" Kakimoto Catback Exhaust

K&N Pod Filter

Custom Heat Shield

RB25 Turbo with RB20 Actuator (increases base boost by around 3psi)

R34 GTT Sidemount Intercooler with Custom Piping

D2 Fuel Pressure Regulator

Walbro 255 Litre/Hour Fuel Pump

Turbotech Boost Controller set at 11.5psi

ECU Tuned by Dr_Drift

Is this close enough to 170kw for you? :P

dyno002.jpg

mods to get there are:

Flying Performance 3" Front/Dump Pipe

3" High-Flow Cat

3" Kakimoto Catback Exhaust

K&N Pod Filter

Custom Heat Shield

RB25 Turbo with RB20 Actuator (increases base boost by around 3psi)

R34 GTT Sidemount Intercooler with Custom Piping

D2 Fuel Pressure Regulator

Walbro 255 Litre/Hour Fuel Pump

Turbotech Boost Controller set at 11.5psi

ECU Tuned by Dr_Drift

You're my hero! That's exactly what I wanted to hear. Now I just gotta make up my mind as to whether I spend the extra $3000 - $4000 to get all of those mods.

Thanks again,

Adrian.

hey

i have a pod cat bak zorst boost controller bov and i make 173kws at rear wheels

That doesn't sound right. Maybe you've already got an aftermarket turbo kit fitted or something. That, or you're running WAY too much boost, and your motor is going to pop open any second. I can't see the bov making much difference.

Either way, I don't like it.

VG30

fuel pump

fuel reg

HKS FCD

pod

zorst

fmic

target 3g's or less

How come VG30? Isn't that the older turbo from the 3 litre that was used in the VLs? I would have thought the turbo from the R33 would be a better choice. Maybe I'm wrong.

I was thinking that for only 12psi, I could get away with stock turbo.

Guess not.

I'm thinking that if I stay at 12psi I can use the stock RB20 turbo, which will save mucking around. Also want to keep the stock airbox, as I've already got an Apexi Power Intake Filter insert in it, and don't wanna switch to a pod filter if I can avoid it.

Thinking to do:

FLYING PERFORMANCE 3" Front and Dump Pipe in 1

3" High Flow Cat (eBay job)

HYBRID Front Mount Intercooler Kit

BOSCH 040 Fuel Pump

Fuel Pressure Regulator (not sure which brand yet or where to get one from)

APEXI SAFC-2 Fuel Computer

GREDDY Profec-B Spec 2 Boost Controller

Should cost me around $2500 in parts, then obviously whatever installation and tuning costs in addition. If I can get over 160rwkw I'll be happy, but the magic figure is 170! :rolleyes:

Stay tuned...

How come VG30? Isn't that the older turbo from the 3 litre that was used in the VLs? I would have thought the turbo from the R33 would be a better choice. Maybe I'm wrong.

I was thinking that for only 12psi, I could get away with stock turbo.

Guess not.

VG30 turbos come from Z31 300ZXs

they have a bigger exhaust housing so can flow more exhaust gasses and therefore make more top end power

these are known to be pretty laggy on rb20s though as the exhaust housing is designed for a 3L engine not 2L...

but then again, some people dont mind the lag and are happy with the power gains

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...