Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

theres going to be new speed limits enforced in SA .. apparently as of 1st of march ... where ever there is no sign for 60 ... the limit will be 50 which means lots of suburban areas ... dont' u all think this is a load of bull sh*t?? this is just an inconvenience to people ... and a big revenue raiser for the idiots in government!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/
Share on other sites

Agreed, but to tell the truth, when they did this in WA, it didn't really make much difference to travel time etc - just a real PITA trying to remeber to slow down - 'sides I can see 2 good things coming from this

1) I wont have to be constantly changing between 3rd and 4th every time someone slows 5 kays then speeds up again, and

2) Less likely to damage my car (or my kidneys) on the very ordinary roads that exist on smaller streets.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-170566
Share on other sites

I'm surprised it took as long as it did to bring SA into line with the rest of the country. Most of (if not all?) the other states have had 50km/h suburban limits for quite a while now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-171299
Share on other sites

on small suburban roads i don't think i even get near 50km/hr ... it will be just like speed cameras ... not saving any more lives ... just making more money ... and then when they start using speed cameras in spots where people are going 60 in a 50 zone in their own suburb and start getting fines ... then people will start complaining ...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-171332
Share on other sites

I don't agree with the 50km/h policy, & I have no doubt it's more about revenue than road safety, but I'm still surprised it took as long as it did for SA to adopt the 50k limit.

I think we all know that reduced speed limits are a win-win situation for the government. They "appear" to be serious about road safety by reducing speed limits & running big ad campaigns & the like. Then they sit back & reap the $$$ from fines revenue. It's a small outlay for a HUGE return & all the while they look like road safety is their primary concern ;)

If road safety "really" were the issue here speed cameras would be on blackspots not dead straight open stretches of road. Driver education, advanced driver training/courses & tougher licensing would be of major importance. And finally, ad campaigns would be aimed @ increasing awareness of basic road rules that are important to improved traffic flow (like "KEEP F#@KING LEFT UNLESS OVERTAKING!!!!).

sm_soapbox.gif

Rant over.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-171406
Share on other sites

KEEP LEFT UNLESS OVERTAKING - is my #1 pet hate for other road users. Signs are posted every 2km or so along the freeway, yet people are so blind/ignorant/ arrogant to take notice. Getting stuck behind a KC laser doing 100 while next to a semi doing the same speed is frustrating.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-171461
Share on other sites

Perhaps someone should point out to the bean counters the revenue they are missing by not enforcing this rule.

Seems to me that most people are responsible with speed and will only drive to the conditions, an occasional person drives a bit silly - but so many other people have to get picked up for going a few kays over the limit before the idiot driver gets done - and chances are the fine wont slow down the idiot driver.

NB when I say idiot driver, i am talking about irresponsible dicks who like speeding in dangerous places, eg heavy traffic, near schools and small suburban roads etc.

Govt 1, public 0. Its a shame the revenue doesnt go back into roads and driver education.

Hey, this rant thing aint too bad, eh whatsisname...lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-171500
Share on other sites

I guess we have to pay for these assylum seekers somehow..

Freakn Govt.

IMO 60 isn't too fast. Running red lights and doing 60 in school zones appears to be a bigger problem.... 50kay's is still gonna clean up the kid at the school crossing and no doubt kill him but.

Some accidents are unavoidable, but i dont think lowering the speed will fix up these problems. Maybe a bit more common sense on the drivers behalf would improve the problem.

There's a time and place for speeding......excessily..AIR, Mallala and the express way, Not in the street. But there's no way that 60 is too fast.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-172269
Share on other sites

Originally posted by TIMMMAYYY

Maybe a bit more common sense on the driver’s behalf would improve the problem

Yep, that's exactly what's needed. As I posted above, on-going driver ed programs, compulsory advanced driver training, much tougher licensing systems (as per the bike system), ad campaigns covering a wide range of road issues, improvement of roads, the list can go on…….

The reality is though, these things all COST the government money rather than making more $$$. Faaar easier to reduce the speed limits, fine the hell out of everyone & then manipulate the statistics to show the measures they’ve taken are working.

I posted some figures a while back that showed the number of speed cameras in SA, revenue raised & the fatality rate over a 10 or so yr period. No surprise to see stuff all reduction in fatality rates, 500% increase in revenue & tenfold the number of cameras in action. (These fig’s might be a tad out but ya’ get the idea).

I might run for local parliament – Independent candidate “ Anti Speed Camera Party” My one & only policy - The total removal of speed cameras within the yr :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-172491
Share on other sites

50km!!!:thumbdwn:

Signs should read -

Keep left unless overtaking - & if a Skyline,EVO, or any turbo car

is behind you pull over to the side of the road & get the bloody hell out of the way.

Hmmm. might not fit too well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-172845
Share on other sites

Cool! So the Anti Speed Camera Party would get a few votes then. Thanks guys :D

Gotta' love it, not more than a day after my ranting about fine revenue & the media cotton onto the $800per HOUR that SA speed cameras are making to fill state coffers!

800 F@#KING DOLLARS, PER HOUR, 365days a yr!

Now in reponse to this the transport minister (or some other weasel) has stated "It's all up to the driver, don't use the right foot so heavily & you won't have a problem. "The choice is in the drivers hands (or foot)" Yep ok, fair call I say.

However, while it's up to us as drivers to decide what speed we travel, when do we get a say on what speed limits are set & where!?

I can see this state ending up the same as NSW, speed limits reduced well below what's really needed. Areas that were once 100km/h dropped to 80km/h. 80 zones down to 60 & so on & so on....

Just so you guys don't think I'm some kind of speed crazed fool, I completely agree with low speed limits for built up areas, schools etc... nothing faster than 150km/h in these areas :D

Erica,

That's the funniest thing I've read for a while :lol:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10592-new-speed-limits/#findComment-174601
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...