Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

After a long discussion with my auto leccy, we have seen that the ford EF/EL sensors shouldn't be used on skylines. Ever since installing one of these on my car, I have had problems with it. On the scan tool it showed us that the o2 sensor was dropping to 0v, then back up to around .8-.9v at idle. The actual graph showed the o2 sensor was sending all f**ked up signals to the ECU. I dont know if any of you other guys have had the same problems (mostly idle prodlems) that are using the Ford o2 sensor..

has anyone had the same experiences? I may be opening a can of worms here but I'm interested to know.

Thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108130-elef-o2-sensors/
Share on other sites

zactly.. had the same problem when I put one in the 32.. doesn't work as it should... see my warning here too :)http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...ic=43095&st=400

10 mins on the dyno and monitoring the voltage correctly via a datalogger showed this was the case.

It 'kinda' works.. but not properly.

You are best off with an original item, even if it does cost that much more.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108130-elef-o2-sensors/#findComment-1995206
Share on other sites

My Bro-in-law had a generic aftermarket O2 sensor in his 32 and had an intermittent idle problem where the revs would drop and then pickup (if it didn't stall). I spent ages trying to identify the problem and he even purchased another new generic O2 sensor and still had the same problem. I eventually found it to be the source of problem when I could rectify the low idle revs by disconnecting the sensor. Plug it back in and the revs dropped.

Replaced it with a factory item and hasn't missed a beat since.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108130-elef-o2-sensors/#findComment-1995277
Share on other sites

I have fitted a el o2 sensor into mine and had no issues. ('93r33) On the dyno, it runs a tad leaner, but occilates between 14.6 and 15 AFR on idle, but looks to be OK. The stochiometric point is probably a little leaner than the regular item.

Your choice, should you choose to use it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108130-elef-o2-sensors/#findComment-1995677
Share on other sites

well, im going to put my original back in, see how it goes, i have that exact same idle problem, revs drop, rise, almost stall, rise... i thought it was throttle body beind carboned up but ive since cleaned it and its still doing.. ill do it today when i do the water pump and see how it goes ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108130-elef-o2-sensors/#findComment-1996062
Share on other sites

well, im going to put my original back in, see how it goes, i have that exact same idle problem, revs drop, rise, almost stall, rise... i thought it was throttle body beind carboned up but ive since cleaned it and its still doing.. ill do it today when i do the water pump and see how it goes :laugh:

I have an EL falcon Sensor in my series 2 gtst and its been great. I got better fuel mileage too. Havent had any idle problems.

Strange some people are fine and some have problems

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108130-elef-o2-sensors/#findComment-2002013
Share on other sites

Maybe its just an R32 problem? then again, its probably a different sensor :D I think that is mentioned in the big o2 thread.

Yes, you are right. The R32 use a Titania oxygen sensor, this is different to the Ziconia sensors used on other Skylines, and is not interchangeable. No wonder people are having problems on R32's if you're using the wrong type of sensor. :kiss:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108130-elef-o2-sensors/#findComment-2004668
Share on other sites

Does any one know if the R33 GTST sensors (NGK or other brand replacement) work on a GTR ive been trying to find a cheaper option than going to Nissan and no other retailers supply O2 Sensor for the GTR.

Check out the NGK (Aus) website, they should have an NTK replacement for the GTR.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108130-elef-o2-sensors/#findComment-2005765
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...