Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Who says my youth was wasted!

I so need new CPU now, my 3200+ is definitely the bottleneck in my system.

You suck Nightcrawler, now I keep surfing for that right priced cpu.

I WILL NOT UPGRADE TO AM2, if it's just a cpu I can deal with it, but if I decide to do the board as well I KNOW it will get out of hand.

Nice.. :P

I'll be jumping camp next upgrade and will be going a Core 2 Duo.

I'll grab a lower end cpu that runs a suitable multiplier, I have no issues with overclocking, been doing it since the old 486sx25's, never had anything break. This old AMD XP2100+ is still going strong at 3200+ for ~4.5yrs I think its been now.

But.. it really depends on the time. If I can justify spending another few hundred to simply grab the higher end cpu.

Its more noticable when multi-tasking with dual-cores...

i would dissagree hes going from a 3200+ to a 4600+ dual core will be a significant jump in performance

but if the mhz is simular on the single core to the dual core then yes its when it multitasks that you will be streets ahead

im in the market for a new (used) comp. mine died unexpectedly when i came home yesterday and my bro goes your comp just died - he was playing wow ;) . anywho, looking for a 3ghz comp doesnt need to be fancy. can anyone help, on a buget btw.

dang u had to say on a budget im selling my pc and its got all the bells and whistles its arround the 2.7g ONO for all parts brand new and calculated was 4.3g

it comes with near on 2 years manufacturers warranty

ForSale.doc

i would dissagree hes going from a 3200+ to a 4600+ dual core will be a significant jump in performance

but if the mhz is simular on the single core to the dual core then yes its when it multitasks that you will be streets ahead

yes id agree also. I came from a p3 to my x2 now and it was a huge jump. But the real enjoyment comes from doing 2 things fast as and at the same time. Ie video encode + play a game.... ;)

hey Duc, I have a few nice pcs for sale at the moment ... in fact I might post a for sale thread - as I really need to get rid of some of this stuff .... I have just upgraded, and have my old 2500+ rig for sale .... has 512Mb DDR ram, 80Gb HDD, Aluminium PC60 copy case, etc etc .... $500 ..... or I have other systems cheaper

General windows usage one won't notice a jump in performance if you simply swap out the motherboard and drop in a 4600+.

As Bl4ck32 said its the dual core/multitasking where you notice it flicks between apps and allows you to do multiple things at once without bringing the computer to its knee's. Simply increasing cpu speed won't stop the computer dropping to its knees should you encode and do a couple things at once.

Which is what I 'think' bl4ck32 was getting at.

I've setup a few dual core systems now (all have been intel but) and I must say they are damn nice, the system doesn't feel faster than mine it just does things smoother and never really chugs. ;)

For a bargain dual core windows system the 805 Pentium D is a bargain and a half, it is a screamer of an overclocker and only costs $150 odd. Slap 1gb worth of ocz or corsair value type ram in it and you have yourself a fairly reasonable windows system for only a few hundred.

yeah i agree cubes but actual task wasnt really stated

i didnt read between the lines of what bl4ck32 said so yeah ;)

as for those 805 i recon my 650 would encode and read emails better than it

dont try and tell me youll encode a video and play BF2 cause your video will still turn out choppy on dual core (my thougths only havnt done experiments)

The 805's aren't all that bad.

Encode while reading emails and burning a dvd... The dual core does do better than the single core. The system is much more fluid, yes the 650 'may' get the job done a tad quicker but the system responsiveness won't as nice as the dual core.

Thats my experience anyway. Never tried encoding while playing a game... Burnt a dvd in nero while BF2ing yes. ;)

Also... My little old ATI 9700pro in a 805D system pics up 2000 3dmarks2001se. lol, didn't bother with newer 3dmarks, card can't handle it. :D

The old P4 3.4ghz's are ok and roughly on par with the old AMD XP3200+ so not really that grunty. BUT Intel have turned things around with their new Core Duo 2 :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...