Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Who says my youth was wasted!

I so need new CPU now, my 3200+ is definitely the bottleneck in my system.

You suck Nightcrawler, now I keep surfing for that right priced cpu.

I WILL NOT UPGRADE TO AM2, if it's just a cpu I can deal with it, but if I decide to do the board as well I KNOW it will get out of hand.

Nice.. :P

I'll be jumping camp next upgrade and will be going a Core 2 Duo.

I'll grab a lower end cpu that runs a suitable multiplier, I have no issues with overclocking, been doing it since the old 486sx25's, never had anything break. This old AMD XP2100+ is still going strong at 3200+ for ~4.5yrs I think its been now.

But.. it really depends on the time. If I can justify spending another few hundred to simply grab the higher end cpu.

Its more noticable when multi-tasking with dual-cores...

i would dissagree hes going from a 3200+ to a 4600+ dual core will be a significant jump in performance

but if the mhz is simular on the single core to the dual core then yes its when it multitasks that you will be streets ahead

im in the market for a new (used) comp. mine died unexpectedly when i came home yesterday and my bro goes your comp just died - he was playing wow ;) . anywho, looking for a 3ghz comp doesnt need to be fancy. can anyone help, on a buget btw.

dang u had to say on a budget im selling my pc and its got all the bells and whistles its arround the 2.7g ONO for all parts brand new and calculated was 4.3g

it comes with near on 2 years manufacturers warranty

ForSale.doc

i would dissagree hes going from a 3200+ to a 4600+ dual core will be a significant jump in performance

but if the mhz is simular on the single core to the dual core then yes its when it multitasks that you will be streets ahead

yes id agree also. I came from a p3 to my x2 now and it was a huge jump. But the real enjoyment comes from doing 2 things fast as and at the same time. Ie video encode + play a game.... ;)

hey Duc, I have a few nice pcs for sale at the moment ... in fact I might post a for sale thread - as I really need to get rid of some of this stuff .... I have just upgraded, and have my old 2500+ rig for sale .... has 512Mb DDR ram, 80Gb HDD, Aluminium PC60 copy case, etc etc .... $500 ..... or I have other systems cheaper

General windows usage one won't notice a jump in performance if you simply swap out the motherboard and drop in a 4600+.

As Bl4ck32 said its the dual core/multitasking where you notice it flicks between apps and allows you to do multiple things at once without bringing the computer to its knee's. Simply increasing cpu speed won't stop the computer dropping to its knees should you encode and do a couple things at once.

Which is what I 'think' bl4ck32 was getting at.

I've setup a few dual core systems now (all have been intel but) and I must say they are damn nice, the system doesn't feel faster than mine it just does things smoother and never really chugs. ;)

For a bargain dual core windows system the 805 Pentium D is a bargain and a half, it is a screamer of an overclocker and only costs $150 odd. Slap 1gb worth of ocz or corsair value type ram in it and you have yourself a fairly reasonable windows system for only a few hundred.

yeah i agree cubes but actual task wasnt really stated

i didnt read between the lines of what bl4ck32 said so yeah ;)

as for those 805 i recon my 650 would encode and read emails better than it

dont try and tell me youll encode a video and play BF2 cause your video will still turn out choppy on dual core (my thougths only havnt done experiments)

The 805's aren't all that bad.

Encode while reading emails and burning a dvd... The dual core does do better than the single core. The system is much more fluid, yes the 650 'may' get the job done a tad quicker but the system responsiveness won't as nice as the dual core.

Thats my experience anyway. Never tried encoding while playing a game... Burnt a dvd in nero while BF2ing yes. ;)

Also... My little old ATI 9700pro in a 805D system pics up 2000 3dmarks2001se. lol, didn't bother with newer 3dmarks, card can't handle it. :D

The old P4 3.4ghz's are ok and roughly on par with the old AMD XP3200+ so not really that grunty. BUT Intel have turned things around with their new Core Duo 2 :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...