Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i like it in torrents how i can upload sweet f**k all and download at upwards 150kb a sec with cable. adsl u share too much. i dont like sharing cause stupid bigpond counts uploads to dl limit.

Yep, with node I can max my download to about 90% in the first week, then seed for free for the next 3 weeks! My torrents all autorun til 300% seedage, most closed community trackers require you to give back at least as much as you take out!

leechers dont suck... if you are talking about the way leechers are able to get forms of illegal media, why does it suck. it shouldnt affect anyone but the software developers... are u a software developer. I leech, doesnt matter what file. im allowed to and i dont need to count 3 gigs to my dl limit if its a 1.5gb file. even when i get adsl2+ i will still limit it.

no SAZilla, he is saying you suck because you download torrents, but don't upload your fair share. If everyone (or even a reasonable percentage of people) did this, the whole system would not work.

I have never downloaded a file that I didn't seed back to 200%.

lol. if u seed it ur doing soemthing even more illegal if you are talking about illegal software. distributing further. if people leech there is nothing u can do about it, and dont say i suck because everyone does it and dare say you have done it before. there is no good in seeding or leeching, if ur talking about sharing fine, but there is no morality in either. and thats the fact.

I use open trackers, i dont get any files from closed groups because I have to. If you want to seed your file on a public tracker thats your descision. i can do what i like.

Edited by SAZilla

dude, no-one (except you) is going off on a tangent of legality etc - that has nothing to do with anything ....

You said "i like it in torrents how i can upload sweet f**k all and download at upwards 150kb a sec with cable. adsl u share too much. i dont like sharing"

.... what I responded was that this is a bad attitude.

If you download a 1Gb file, then you should leave the file sharing in your torrent client until you have uploaded 1Gb back into the system.

Then you are sharing it with everyone else, rather than just downloading the file and not sharing it. If everybody did this then you would never have been able to download the file in the 1st place. Understand?

The point is if you want fast torrents do the "right" thing and stay on the torrent, Im part of a private bit torrent tracker where you get banned if your ratio is under .95 and as a result you get an average of 300-1000kb/s on all new releases (movies games tv shows etc)

dude, no-one (except you) is going off on a tangent of legality etc - that has nothing to do with anything ....

You said "i like it in torrents how i can upload sweet f**k all and download at upwards 150kb a sec with cable. adsl u share too much. i dont like sharing"

.... what I responded was that this is a bad attitude.

If you download a 1Gb file, then you should leave the file sharing in your torrent client until you have uploaded 1Gb back into the system.

Then you are sharing it with everyone else, rather than just downloading the file and not sharing it. If everybody did this then you would never have been able to download the file in the 1st place. Understand?

ok, fair enough. I used legality so we could all be *careful* on this issue. u as a moderator and I as an administrator should know this. secondly, i get around 10-20 percent of my downloads from torrents, and the rest thru FTP and HTTP direct links, which in most cases are much faster, stored on big servers where bandwidth usually isnt a problem, and everyone is happy. what else can I say.

Edited by SAZilla
you have to upload in order to download. it doesnt cost me anything to upload - last i recalled, so it doesnt phase me.

rolls, keen on letting me in on your 'priavte' network?

it costs me, hence why i am ultra-reluctant. if it didnt cost me anything i would let sharing go on over night, but because i have 3 other computers in the family each complaining about bandwidth it would be highly innaprporiate and inconveniant on this cable connection. even on ADSL2 it would be the same.

if thats the case, your better off going to lan's for your files or whatever it is you like to download. i havent been to one for 5 yrs.

on that note.....

SAU SA LAN??? I WANT TO PLAY BF2!!!!!! with little to no ping yo!

you have to upload in order to download. it doesnt cost me anything to upload - last i recalled, so it doesnt phase me.

rolls, keen on letting me in on your 'priavte' network?

Haha, my ratio is 800/300gig over the last year and Ive gotten a total of 1 invite which I've used. Maybe if I ever get another one. They are pretty elitest though, if you invite someone and they f**k up (shit ratio) you get banned as well. Great system though, get alot of stuff before its even seen on newsgroups and private FTPs etc.

what is the name of the group Rolls? I am a member of 'tvtorrents' and have just made up my 11Gcredits that you need to invite someone. That is, I have uploaded 11 times what I have downloaded (well almost - you can get bonus credits so it is not a directly linear thing).

#1 - The first rule of Fight Club is, you do not talk about Fight Club.

#2 - The second rule of Fight Club is, you DO NOT talk about Fight Club.

No shit they search google for the name of the community and track down forum posts, alexa browsing history etc, get your IP and compare it to their active users and ban you for breaking the first rule. I wasn't joking when I said it was elitest. Dont worry man theres no way you can get in unless someone gives you an invite, and not many people get them.

I can however give you an invite to supertorrents.org, its pretty good for recent releases and they also maintain banning of users with poor ratios so you get wicked speeds. I've got 4 invites 3 of which I'm willing to give away, if you think you can maintain a ratio of at least 1:1 wing me a PM.

it costs me, hence why i am ultra-reluctant. if it didnt cost me anything i would let sharing go on over night, but because i have 3 other computers in the family each complaining about bandwidth it would be highly innaprporiate and inconveniant on this cable connection. even on ADSL2 it would be the same.

Multiple users with the high upstream of adsl2 works excellent. capping upstream to ~70-80kb/s and having 3-4people web browsing isn't a problem.

I use torrent and Internodes Premium Usenet. Usenet kicks shiet over anything else for speed.

For usenet I use Newsleecher with its supersearch function. Awesome combination. :blink:

I'm a member of a private torrent site. Awesome speeds almost all the time with latest releases.

Always share what I take as a bare minimum and continue to seed should the seed/leecher ratio suck.

on that note.....

SAU SA LAN??? I WANT TO PLAY BF2!!!!!! with little to no ping yo!

hehhe

Little or no ping will not help you escape the wrath of Cubes.. lol :happy:

It will happen, but its going to be after xmas. There's quite a bit of work and $$ to get suitable benches around the back room.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...