Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK guy for those that missed out those to deposit the most money in my account can fight for 3 Quake wars keys :rolleyes:

EDIT

1) Pauly33GTS-t key sent

2) your name here

**UPDATED**

Edited by Madaz

black32. the ps3 is not overpriced, it is priced correctly, go and buy all the units that the ps3 can do as per its specs for under 1000, that and i got my ps3 for 850. 2ndly the games are awesome, and to that, the games at the moment are only using 30 percent of cell's capability. so in september they expect those games to use close to 50 percent and next year hopefully with pro evo 2008 the console will be made most of its own resources by developers.

microsoft knows that the ps3 will overtake it eventually, ps2 alraedy won the xbox vs ps2 war because it was just so popular, but now xbox has released its console early to compete with the ps3 but the ps3's technology is so far more advanced.

yes I have a hd tv, and yes you need one to witness how good it is. if u have an xbox360 how dissapointed were u for being lied to about having a HDMI output on ur console, HDMI ftw. and blueray, you can tell the difference between a blueray and a dvd at 1080p. indeed. the winner is ps3, at the moment xbox360 is only winning because ppl couldnt wait for a next gen console when it was released.

Edited by Pauly33GTS-t

pauly please don't embarrass yourself anymore.

I can easily spec a ps3 for under 1000 dollars. It's called buying a US or Japanese unit. Or you could buy a korean unit get a bigger HDD standard and also pay less. Or you could get the aformentioned US or Japanese unit and receive what we were promised in the form of a EE and GS chipset.

Your take on the games is "subjective" not "objective" the launch was quite weak with no AAA quality titles. That is a fact check the reviews worldwide. Yes games on a whole are more down to personal taste but looking at them objectively not 1 single game at the ps3 launch improves on what has already been done.

And black32 what the hell are you talking about? I've made no mention of game prices. I've paid over 3x that much for games on the Neo Geo so 100 dollars for a game seems pretty good to me.

And to get use of the eye candy you do need a high definition display your an idiot if you don't believe that.

And as i've mentioned numerious times i am a sony fanboy at heart. I'm just not stupid enough to beleive the crap sony has been sprouting the past few years.

how can u say u dont need HDMI when its the only way youll get 1080p on high def monitors.... you are crazy kralster. HDMI is going to be a standard, as its just been proven to be so good. its not sony promising bullshit, what have they said about the ps3 that has been bullshit apart from a few things that could probably be fixed with better firmware...

Yes you do notice a great jump in clarity with 1080p than viewing it on ur old dog rumpus room tv u bought for 82 dollars at a garage sale...

and how the f**k have i embarassed myself by displaying general knowledge? microsoft said xbox will have hdmi... but it doesnt. great. i feel embarassed now.

Edited by Pauly33GTS-t

Why are we talking about HMDi all of the sudden? i see no mention of it anywhere in this thread.

HDMi is not the best either espcially for carrying audio. You will be hard pressed to find anything that sounds better than a good quality balanced imput, or a coaxial digital cable.

Microsoft never said the 360 would have HDMi either so i don't know where you got that. They in fact said that it wouldn't be neccesasary on the 360. I do agree though that it would of been wise to have the option of both an AV multi out and a HDMi on the 360, the same as on the ps3.

Also i hate to break it to you but 1080P can be done over component cables. (you may wanna research stuff before you say it) The 360 has been doing it since Febuary. And the ps3 has been able to do it all the time. The biggest problem is finding a screen that accepts 1080P over component becasue a lot do not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...