Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

welcome to teh interwebs boys.

My personal opinion = waste of time buying consoles for gaming.

Computer for me always.

lol x2 cant agree more

but the console if good for when a couple of mates come over you got the Gran Tarismo few drinks under your belt and eveyones a race car driver

haha no it won't.

Metal gear is set for March next year. Why would sony release probably the two biggest franchises newest games at the same time lol.

Also masively avaible and worthwile? what are you on about?

Because Sony dont release them. and from past history, they have always seemed to be released around the same times, i mean... Gran Turismo is in its 4th intallment, and so will Metal Gear be in its 4th installment.

They will be released within 1 month of eachother is my prediction.

To answer your question Kralster, to make more money.

You'll have Grant Turismo edition PS3 console packages, and Metal Gear Solid 4 ones and etc. As it has happened in the past with the Playstation.

And Steve, the Cell processor is more advanced than Intel's Core 2. IBM plans a comeback with using it in its future computers and laptops, not sure if itll run Windows though.

So you've gone from saying released at the same time to a month after each other. I agree a month later for one of the titles would be a good idea. But i don't see the next gran turismo being finished until late next year at the earliest.

Gran Turismo - May 1998

Metal Gear Solid Febuary 99 (9 months later)

Gran Turismo 2 - October 2000

Metal Gear Solid 2 March 2002 (17 months later)

Gran Turismo 3 - July 2001

Metal Gear Solid 3 - March 2005 (over 4 years later)

Gran Turismo 4 - March 2005

Metal Gear Solid 4 - Still TBC but March 2008 current release schedule (over 3 years)

I don't see how in past history they have been close to each other.

well if ur going by those dates and look more at the japanese release ones NTSC i think they are much much closer.

Same time I meant more around the same quarter. I can see GT5 being released around June next year.

Now your saying June next year. Before you were saying the same time a MGS4, than about a month later, now 3 months later.

And the release dates for those games in japan were also with about the same distance between them.

Also playstation 1 and 2 consoles have only ever been bundled with first party sony titles. There may of been soft bundles with games from 3rd party developers, but never in the same box.

Anyways.

What do you think of quake wars Madaz?

I don't mind it myself, not what it was hyped up to be but then again, what is these days?

dont hate it prefer GRAW2 though i like the more realistic looking skins than set in the future

im a little excited over COD4 not being WW2 shooter that might be one to watch out for

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstah, no, coilovers aren't illegal, especially as a bolt straight in. The illegal part will be if they're altering suspension geometry beyond factory limits, or the ride height is not legal.   Sounds like the blue slipper just didn't want to deal with any later possibility of mods appearing on the car.
    • The problem has always been that coilovers are able to be adjusted, almost at any time, to be too low. Most people who ever get/got defected for/with coilovers were actually afoul of the minimum ride height rule. So the interpretation by cops/inspectors was always that it is pointless to allow numpty to raise his coilovers and get the car inspected/cleared, then just drop them back down again as soon as they get around the corner from the inspection station.  This led to the interpretation that they were illegal unless rendered such that they can't be adjusted (ie, collars welded to the body, that sort of thing). That may or may not have ever actually been the official line, but I'm pretty sure it's not considered to be a solution these days. Coilovers themselves fall under clause 3.2 b of that manual, because they are an "installation of a variable ride height system" and they don't fit the exclusions in that clause (which point to air springs and other pneumatic adjusters). So, as per previous statements, they require engineering cert to be legal on the road. Once you have such cert, provided you do not adjust them outside the height range covered by the cert, you are OK. Without, you have an unroadworthy vehicle.
    • Here E10 is the cheapest fuel. And general advice is to not use it unless you hate your car. From what I remember it clogs up stuff in the fuel system or injectors?  With US/Canada being E10 across the board, does that mean that all fuel there is terrible?
    • Sorry, are coilovers ACTUALLY ILLEGAL in NSW? They aren't in Vic, as long as they retain 70% of stock travel and the car is above 100mm off the ground. Does NSW actually have a law making coilovers actually illegal? RWC/Blue Slip/Engineering people not knowing the actual f**king laws boils my blood. Demand them to point to the documentation that states a coilover is illegal. (it may exist in NSW ) Edit: I checked. They aren't. https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-infosheet-light-vehicle-modifications-manual-suspension-and-ride-height.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...