Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im going to give the electronic method a go tonight,

disable idle adjustment from engine and check the drop in rpm in each cylinder, measure it and see what makes the least difference.

in theory this should tell me if i have 1 cylinder that is crap right?

didnt work

Nobody has mentioned the wet/dry arguement yet, so here I go with the spanner in the works.

When I do a compression test (usually I only bother on cars I am buying), I do 2 tests, a dry, followed by a wet test.

I do as mentioned in Manual method, remove the ignitor, spark plugs, set WOT, also remote the fuel pump fuse, and test cylinder by cylinder with my readings written down.

Then I get a bout 10ml (cap ful) of CLEAN engine oil into the cylinder hole and leave it for a minute or 2 so that the oil can spread to the edges of the piston and form a thin layer and SEAL the piston ring area.

Then I re-test as above, and re-record the results and figures.

The reason for doing this is because in Dry testing, you get figures based on what the piston is pushing up, minus any pressure lost through the rings, and any pressure through the valves.

In Wet testing, you get the piston pressure minus any pressure lost through the valves, so it gives you a little bit extra in information.

If you see MASSIVE difference in figures from a wet and dry test, it means the rings are worn, and you would have gotten low-ish readings from the initial test.

If you see almost no difference, it shows the rings are in very good condition, not loosing much pressure at all, but if you still have low readings, you might need to check your valves and seats.

I last did a compression test on a Toyora Soarer 1JZ.

Dry:

1: 165 2: 163 3: 167 4: 165 5: 164 6: 168

Wet:

1: 169 2: 168 3: 172 4: 168 5: 167 6: 172

This test shows that in both figures the engine is healthy, there isn't a huge difference in figures from piston to piston, and the figures are high enough to show there isn't much pressure loss or wear and tear.

The wet figures are all around 3 - 5PSI higher than the dry figures, so there is a small amount of pressure lost on the rings, but not a great deal, nothing to be concerned about.

It also shows that the vavles are sealing nicely, and are not an issue, I was happy with these figures, and purchased the car :whistling:

B.

  • 1 year later...

hey guys sorry to bump a real old thread

just wanna make sure im gonna do this right

firstly is this compression gauge going to be suitable: http://imgur.com/bzHN3.jpg

secondly, would i be right in thinking a good way to crank the engine to get a reading would be

- disconnect CAS + coilpack loom

- depress accelerator fully for WOT

- turn key as if i was starting the car

- go check reading on gauge, do this for dry and wet test as poster above.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I’ve just finished fitting the timing belt on my RB25, following the standard procedure: rotate the crank twice, release the tensioner, then tighten it down. The belt feels tight, and you can see that clearly in the picture below I’ve heard some people say it’s actually better for the belt to be slightly loose rather than too tight, as excessive tension can lead to snapping. So that’s in the back of my mind. What I’m seeing is this:  • At idle, the belt looks fine.  • But when cranking and especially when revving (around 3–4,000 RPM), there’s a momentary flap/flex or flicker in the belt, which I’ve tried to capture in the video. So my question is — based on what you see, is this slight belt movement something you’d consider normal, or am I just being OCD? Could this amount of movement cause sync issues? Or is it just a harmless bit of flex under load?   from what I know belt flap and flex is expected when crank spins up and pull cam with it Would appreciate any thoughts or similar experiences.     IMG_7656.mov IMG_7657.mov
    • I've replaced the front brakes of my NA to 324 brembos and 350z calipers: i'm going for 225/40-18 up front and 245/35-18 in the back. I have Rays 7.5*19 ET35(225/35) in the front with 5mm spacers otherwise the calipers "lock up/ won't rotate". When i use the calculator i come up with 8*18 ET30 for 225/40...... but not sure i get problems with the calipers. Anyone riding around with 18 inch. that can confirm "that it'll fit"? In the back it's 7.5*9 ET30 (245/30) with the 5mm spacers, but there is no problem with the standard small brakes, so i want to take 8.5*18 ET25 (245/35).
    • Lol.. but then.. always come back to a JDM..
    • Glad to hear. If possible, get your tuner to check air's to make sure everything is still where it should be.
    • The problem with FB/Insta/Reddit etc comments relating to cars is simple. You get to ask a question once, and get one round of replies. For things that can actually be answered in a few lines of text, once, it's fine. After 6 hours, your original question is lost to the void. There are no follow ups, additional questions, anything. No project car is ever such a simple list of questions to ask. You need discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...