Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have an R34 GTT, and i was trying to unplug one of the boost lines so i could plug in the T piece and one of the plugs snapped, its attached to something labled 'turbo gauge' (i think) which goes to electronic plug.

cable is found right near the firewall, center of the car, just behind the factory strut brace.

basically, one of the tubes coming from just before the TB, it goes into a big round circle, red + black, then went into the plug i broke, then to an electronic sensor..which would go back to the ECU somewhere i think...

ill put up pics when i get home, car drives fine... boost gauge still works fine. just wanting to know if i should get it replaced or not to worry.

thanks for any usefull advice in advance :devil:

mebroke.JPG

Edited by illusiVe
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/112605-what-did-i-break-s/
Share on other sites

yer thats what i thought... at first i thought ooo sheez.. cause it was only 1 day old to me... but took it for a boost around, still drives exactly the same, it might have a secondary which it uses elsewhere in the engine bay..

ill post up a pic to make sure we are thinkin about the same item.

wierd....I thought what adam thought. the gauge runs of the sender on the firewall. the input to the sender is the boost line.

If that boost line is split you should be getting eleventy billion pounds of boost. if the electric plug is broken you should be getting no reading?

got a pic?

ya,, the r34's have a map sensor,,, its on a bracket off the firewall

located

i think u've broken the map sensor plug,, this sends boost pressure signal to the ECU. I have seen an r34 which had the Map sensor vacuum hose removed,dunno how it affected the performance or fuel economy,(but its probably best to get it fixed, since u want ur ecu to be reading correct boost pressure)

i've highlighted the map sensor in blue

post-3252-1144373729.jpg

post-3252-1144373938.jpg

Same thing happened to when I was changing my plugs. Didnt notice it was there and snapped it when removing bits and pieces to get to the plugs.

With it broken, there was no effect on performance or anything, I didnt notice any strange in the car either.

Only thing was that the engine light came up because I disconnected the plug. But if you connect it and just leave the nozzle unattached, I think its fine.

You can try getting some liquid nails and gluing it back on, thats what I did. Worked a treat for me, but I ended up finding a GTT wreck and replaced mine in the end anyways.

A new sensor from Nissan will cost you apprx $150, well that was the quote I was given.

I know a few guys who have blocked off the hole that the hose from the MAP sensor would lead to, and some guys just leave it. No problems reported frmo them yet.

I used araldite, that glue that comes in 2 parts that you mix

dries up clear, and dries as pretty hard plastic, just get it all around the nozzle and the outside, cake it on

might be useful as hot glue guns arent that strong

just be careful and try not to get glue inside the hose

have showed the factory boost sensor and its vacuum hose (coloured red)

i suggest u replace this vacuum hose coz it will be old and hard (it might be a bit hard to remove from the sensor and off the manifold (don't break sensor plug also,, haha),,,, i replaced mine,coz it was all hard and old (even though it only had 20K kms on it,,, took hose to autobarn and they matched one up for me,,, like $5 or something,,

ask them to give u a tee piece to suit ,,,

:)

post-3252-1144394998.jpg

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...