Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Airflow is all 100%.

With the R33 Airflow correction table it wouldn't idle, unsure why as its running everything R33, being the airflow curve, maps, etc..

With regards to afm voltage, it peaks at 4330mv, being 4.33v. ;)

Running the std afm that would be around 5 to 5.1v.

I've attached a tuned vs untuned compare map.

The red indicates leaned off.

For example if the initial value is 1.000 the modified value is 0.996 the compare map will indicate a red value of 4. Derived from 1.000 - 0.996 = 0.004.

unsure what the +19 value is at load point 9 rpm N06. Possibly a tuning slip up. :D

An hour was only spent working on light load so it isn't a perect tune, the other hour was trouble shooting. :P

The tunes rough enough for now. No point spending big $$ (500-600) on a nice tune when there's bigger turbo's to come and will most likely require a map resolution (map reference) change. :D

post-382-1144475190.gif

Well I went for a long drive today. Did 230km's and used 1/2 a tank of fuel. Now I was driving normally for about 80% of the drive, I did some overtaking and saw 160-170k a few times... and the first 1/6 of the drive was actually a hill climb up a local range where I just couldn't help myself playing chase with someone in an evo 4 and occasionally hit around 5500 rpm at 16lb. Incidently this is about 10-11ms pulse width on the injectors. I also sat on about 120k's for 3/4 of the trip home.

Relivent details for the engine are.... RB20DET 100% internall stock, GT25 BB 400, 0.64 compressor, 0.7 turbine, Wolf ecu, front mount IC. My GTS4 has a manual gtr gearbox too, not the auto.

Here's my current map settings approx...As a lot of you use MAF instead if MAP sensors i'll translate to PSI and you can all work it out from that...

Below 2000 RPM...

0 PSI - 14.2

-5 in-hg - 14.0

-10in-gh - 13.8:1 (going slightly rich here really helped make the throttle response snappy.

-18in-hg 14.2 to 13.8 depending if aircon is on at idle, and about 14.0 when cruising.

Above 2000 RPM

2psi - 14.2:1

0psi - 14.7:1

-5in-hg - 15:1

-10in-gh - 15.5:1

-15in-hg - 16:1

-20in-hg - 0:1 (0ms fuel value)

Ignition advance was at 36 degrees. at 0 psi and increases to a max of 38 or 42 under vacuum. I can't remember exactly how far it advances.

I am also using decceleration En-leanment. The reverse of a throttle pump setting to lean things during negative throttle movements, which is one of the advances settings for economy tuning the wolf.

Closed loop operation was disabled for the whole drive.

The resutls... All in 5th gear.

Peak cruise power was found to be at about -5hg on the boost gauge at 100-105k's in 5th gear on level ground. The injector pulse width maxed out at about 2.40ms to 2.45ms. This was while at a 15.5:1 AFR.

Increasing speed to 110k's increased the fuel requirement to about 2.6ms and the resulting change to 14.7:1 AFR at 0 PSI.

Finally at 120k's the fuel requirement increased further to 2.8ms and again maintained around 14.7:1 AFR at 0 PSI.

So, I think with this tune if I were able to keep my right foot under control (or install a throttle stop) I could possibly see 500k's with this tune.

I'll post the actual map up tomorrow.

I'll have to also see how things go this next week with driving around town economy. Results will be posted.

Cheers,

Ian

Well the wolf uses a setting called Transient Delcel Enleanment. It does the reverse of a throttle pump and reduces fuel delivered to the engine during deceleration.

Eg... SUppose you are cruising at 100k's and start to go down a slight incline, you remove your foot slightly from the accelerator to maintain the same road speed. The wolf will reduce fuel delivery a pre-set amount for a preset limit, exactly the same as a carburators throttle pump would add fuel during acceleration, but reverse. This keeps reduces un-necessary overfueling while the ecu settles on a new RPM/MAP sensor position on the fuel map.

Remember the reason for transient enrichment in a carburator is to deliver extra fuel to stop hesitation during sudden throttle position changes, while map or maf sensors settle on a new load setting. Transient ENLEANMENT does the opposite to concerve fuel.

I also use Over run fuel cut, which is meant for when your rolling down a hill and take your foot off the accelerator. Above 1600 RPM and at 0 throttle the ecu stops all fuel delivery and lets the engine naturally reduce engine speed. Its also used between gear shifts.

You turn both these off if you want to maintain boost better between gear shifts and are racing or something.

Hope that helps...

Cheers,

Ian.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...