Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , people are starting to ask the power potential of the TO4Z and its worthwile discussing some of the available alternatives .

It no secret that the TO4Z cartridge is an evolution of the Garrett/HKS TO4R turbo and now has a modified GT40R/GT42R/T51R style ball bearing centre section . It also uses the TO4 P trim turbine which is getting pretty long in the tooth . Its surprising that they chose that turbine given that the ball bearing GT40R was being developed though to be fair it was not then being tested in its final form (Garrett were still playing with the 84T GT40 turbine) .

Garrett is starting to change their ideas about turbine trims for petrol engines and moving down from the agricultural 84T to lower sizes such as the 78T in the final release version of the GT40R (GT4088R) . The old P trim measures about 74.2mm OD and is 76 trim , its rather heavy and uses I think 11 blades compared to the 10 Garrett uses on the UHP family ie GT35/37/40/42 . Many people are saying that the 68mm GT35 turbine can pretty much do the same job while being more compact and have less innertia to overcome at the spool phase . It sounds good to me though The 68mm turbine compared to the 84mm TO4R compressor wheel makes me think hmm are the turbine blades long enough to get good easy low gas speed shaft power , did the TO4Z use the P for this reason ? I think Garrett should have looked at using their 72.5mm GT37 turbine in an appropriate trim to replace the aging P when it grew balls .

The fact that the GT40 ball bearing cartridges turbine is 78 trim rather than 84T sent me after its turbine map to see how it weighed up compared to the GT35R's turbine map . The smallest .85AR turbine housing for the GT4088R comes out at a similar ~ 32lbs of corrected flow to the GT35R with its largest 1.06AR turbine housing thought the 40R reaches this point at lower pressure ratio than the 35R .

Then I started to find mention of a hybrid GT40R 67 (67 is what the Americans call the TO4R compressor) which is the GT40R hotside and the TO4Z compressor end combined .

A company called Precision Turbo and Engine get this combination made up and market it in the US as the GT4067R .

The as sold GT4088R is no slouch either though it has gone to a new 7/14 blade GT compressor of the C117 family . It uses a huge .72AR GT40 port shrouded cover which looks like a carry over from the TA45 series turbos . The debate over GT4067R/GT4088R is ongoing in the US but the power developed is easily in the 7-800Hp and beyond with the best optomised housings and engine setup . The Honda/Lancer/Supra people are developing all sorts of things ATM and much of it surrounds these turbos or the even larger GT42R/HKS T51R . Just on these last two take note that HKS's T51R gets the 76T 82mm turbine while the Garrett GT42R gets fobbed of with the 84Trim 82mm turbine - Power and Response by High Kost Spec .....

So anyway the TO4Z or GT4067R or GT4088R are all vying for the 650-750Hp arena with the US performance crowd pushing the two GT40R based turbos . I have a feeling that the Precision GT4067R will be the best all rounder and very tunable with turbine and compressor housings . Its unfortunatly going to be the most expensive of the non HKS options because it has to be disassembled and balanced plus its unique backplate machined up and fitted . Garrett could do a lot worse than offer it themselves .

Any of these turbos are not for the faint hearted and probably need a high reving RB26 or preferably an RB30DET to do them justice .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113606-to4z-and-alternatives/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
×
×
  • Create New...