Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok.. its getting close..

Is anybody going to be at station peer around 8pm? If so i'll go down there and meet on the way to calder.. otherwise I will just go straight to calder and call somebody from there and see whether i can meet up with ppl.

I'd go earlier, but I don't get home till 6pm or so anyway.

I'm sure there could be a possible meet afterwards and/or cruise for those that can't/don't want to go to calder... would be around 11pm.

Where was everybody??!

Made it to Station Peer (no.3 basically where the Able Tasman was) about 7:30-7-45pm and there was nobody other skylines! Waited around and had a bit of a look, but still no skylines. Horus turned up, and we had a bit of a drink and things. Phat32 turned up at around 8:30pm and then Myself, phat32, and Horus cruised to calder.

Got to calder about 9 (bit late!), saw a bunch of cars run. Met Hotsky and ?? (are your mates on here?). Mostly supercharged cortinas, toranas, and the like.. although a couple of R33 GTR run 11's. Went to the city, lost phat32 due to parking issues (kinda busy being GP weekend) and ended up at Pug Mahones, where vickii met us bit later.. So we stayed there till 2 after a few drinks and went home.

Overall pretty good night.. no major dramas... although i cracked the hell outta my front bar at calder (time for a bit of a fibreglass repair jobby) when the ground jumped out at me.

I think next time we just need to co-ordinate exact times and things so people can meet up a bit better and have a more defined plan.

nah my mates arent on here at all, one guy bruce(the more talkative one about carshehe) drives a torana, and the other cuy clinton just drives me nuts(no car)

was a pretty good night at the track(best part was meeting a few peeps) didnt catch up with others in city aftrer, phat32 was gonna ring me, but i was 3/4 home when i got a surprise call from MILK lol oh well its all good

yeah..none of the skylines that I saw seemed to be flat shifting.. the changes were sloppy and visible.

Next one is 17th - If my car is running decent again by then might take it down the strip and see how much I can **** up a launch.. hehe

There were quite a few that got under the 10's but most were pretty serious drag-only cars.

il b etheer with u if ur taking it on the 17th

i wanna try break 13's with a stock car.. no boost either.. so friken close last time

speaking of stuffing take offs.. haha cant beat me. i got a 17.9 and stalked it.. ahhaha .. very first time i lined up. i was against a big V8 with no exhaust and shit my elf when he took offf ahhh welll

hopefully i can beat 14.015 and break 13's then il be happy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...