Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi browny, we have a GCG hi flowed RB25DET turbo on an RB20DET running at 1.1 bar that makes 210 rwkw, good boost at 3,000 rpm, flat torque curve from 4,000 rpm to 7,250 rpm.

Turn the boost up to 1.5 bar and it's over 250 rwkw, gets bit of intercooler heat soak during a longer race, but the new intercooler will fix that (standard R33 GTR one). Also less restriction, so should make 1.5 bar (at the engine) with lower boost at the turbo, less heat generated there as well.

We are going to upgrade the compressor cover when we go to the larger capacity engine so there is still plenty left in the R33 turbo yet. According to the flow maps 500 bhp is not out of the question.

Hope that helps.

Clint....how can you make that power on stock injectors? Even the cleanest set will only flow enough for 220rwkw, I am not doubting you its just that I am curious.

Browny, here are the specs to my old RB20DET

215rwkw (220rwkw with special fuel)

ARE front mount intercooler (500x300x75)

VG30 non ball bearing turbo with ceramic exh. wheel @ 14psi

HKS Cam gears

3.5" exhaust from turbo including dump

APEXi S-AFC

Blitz Access ecu (any tuned rom is fine)

HKS Air filter

Other things to take into consideration:

Oil catch can

Clutch

I drove the car every day and it was fine, the vg30 doesn't change the power point too much in fact I rathered it as most times around town I was only just on boost so fuel economy was great. You can also read the thread I started about 250rwkw from a RB20 to get another idea

Hi browny, currently spec'd same as XTRGTST-STG1 450hp rated, and upgrade the necessary bits to XTRGTST-STG2 spec, 500hp rated for the next engine.

The RB20DET injectors are supposed to be 270 cc's, if so would be good for 300 bhp (170 rwkw) max. But we have an RB20DET that makes 210 rwkw on the standard injectors and there are a number of others with the same hp or even more.

I have never flow tested a standard set, we just automatically replace them (with RX7 Series V turbo ones 550 cc's) if more than 300 bhp is needed. When I take this set out I am going to stick them on the injector flow tester and confirm the 270 cc's.

Standard AFM is OK to around 400 bhp, then we go to Z32 AFM, doesn't flow any more but has resolution at higher airflow.

An ECU upgrade is essential, we use an Apexi Power FC.

Hope that helps.

Boostmeister it made the power without any special trics, and the dyno is not magic one either, same dyno same car with the normal mods (14psi, dump back 3", large FMIC, pod) 136rwkw. Add one TO4 turbo and wastegate, 16psi and a decent tune and 234rwkw. The 044 pump does help as unlike some big pumps they will flow a lot more with a high pressure. And they were cleanded the day before so it has to help.

The fact that people say they are 270cc is very suss as they would be lucky to make 170rwkw as sydneykid says so they have to bigger. Someone will have to have one flow tested to be sure then we can have some info to argue over.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...