Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the really handy guide there,

But unfortunately aside from the melted springy bits. This was also the result of it not functioning for me.

minip1090633lz7.jpg

Has anyone ever come across this? I'm definitely in need of a whole new switch assembly and a new plug bit.

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nasty as.. Mine wasn't that bad but much more and I would have had to replace it.

The plastic was browning and dropping in area's; some of the connectors were slightly black.

I've got mine off the road doing a few bits at the moment. The battery is out and the loom wide open.

Its a silly setup.

L & R headlights (high and low) run off 1 15amp fuse each; the wires run from the fuse to the switch then from the switch all the way back to the head lights.

So for me its.. Snip the wires that return from the switch use that to trigger a relay and then from relay join back in to the std loom that runs to the headlights.

I've got a pair of relays with fuses incorporated so no need for additional wiring etc. + They fit in the 2 empty spots within the fuse box :D

  • 11 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Hi Guys, Sorry to bump a thread that is a year old but I thought this is probably the best place to put this question. I've purchased a 5-Pin Narva 12V 40A Relay with Diode protection (P/No. 68032) to upgrade my headlights wiring loom and have attached a diagram of the schematic (pictured at the top of the relay). post-73235-1275674459_thumb.jpg

My question is which pin is the relay switching input (12v) and which pin is the relay switching output (ground) on this type of relay?

I would normally connect switching 12v to pin 85 and connect ground to pin 86 (as the diode arrow is facing the way the current travels) - but what is throwing me off is Narva's addition of the little positive (+) sign on pin 86 side. The relays are only $8.80 each but i'd rather get it right the first time and not blow the diode unnecessarily so any help would be much appreciated!

Edit: Sorry Mods, I just realised this was in the Tutorial/DIY/FAQ Forum - feel free to delete this and move to the relevant section at your discretion please.

Edited by Dioscorides

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...