Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well as some of you know i'm in the process of putting an XR6 Turbo on my Rb30 Twin cam, most of it has been reasonably staraight forward apart from the actuator was fouling the front compressor housing so i made this little bracket and shortened the travel so that now it doesn't foul anything.

imgp04586ya.th.jpg imgp04597qv.th.jpg imgp04610um.th.jpg imgp04623qt.th.jpg

Basically i want to know if anyone can see this being a problem now or sometime in the future? I tested it with compressed air and it opens fine!

One thing i noticed after welding it was that it had a lot more movement in it, due to the heat. Could i have damaged the internals of the actuator? Can anyone see this being a problem?

The other things is that the wastegate flap now only opens to about 45 degrees, could this be a problem?

Edited by mr_rbman

The problem I see is the actuator not working in the same plane as the wastegate lever so the actuator rod deflects and this may not suit its spring and diaphram . I have had one modified but we used a die nut to run a thread along the shaft and screwed an adapter and lock nut onto it .

The actuator on yours is way clear of the compressor cover but closer to the turbine housing and the bracket is bolted to it which is a worry heat wise . Some turbos have the actuator a long way forward and use long rods . I have a pic of a Garrett TB31 (propper factory T3/TO4E) that I'll post up so you can see how they did it .

Back soon cheers A .

I assume your turbo is the Ford XR6 type GT3540R which uses a TO4E .50AR compressor cover similar to this TB31 .

Indexing the covers/housings can make life difficult with integral gate type turbos but usually something can be made to work .

Most brackets I've seem made were 1/8 mild steel plate and if folds were needed they were made in a vise with a hammer . Cardboard templates help out and can be traced to the plate initially complete with holes marked out .

Given a choise I would always mount them off the comp cover to backplate bolt holes .

Cheers A .

post-9594-1146612435.jpg

post-9594-1146612458.jpg

thanks for the pics, yes it is an xr6 turbo. I was thinking the plate would act as a heat shield??? (5mm thick) Could i have damged the diaphram by welding the rod? I couldn't mount it off the compressor housing as it fouled wherever i put it given i've put the turbo on the standard manifold!

nah, been there done that, it almost hits the engine mount cause its on the standard manifold! The way its facing is the only way i can have it!

Do you know if you can replace just the internals of your wastegate actuator? I'm just a little worried i damaged it while welding it!

Sorry to be so negative........

1. The wastegate actuator should always work in the same plain as the wastgate opening. Wastegate actuators can tolerate slight changes in angle, but I think you have exceeded "slight".

2. Mounting the wastegate actuator so close to the turbine cover is asking for problems, they don'tlike too much heat. That's why the reliable factory wastegate actuators are mounted off the compressor cover, a long way from the turbine.

3. Welding the wastegate actuator was not a good idea, they are simply a diaphram in a metal case, with lightweight spring. Welding heat can have esily damaged the diaphram itself and/or the spring causing it to lose tension. A new wastegate actuator would be on my list.

I would make a bracket off the compressor cover, as forward as necessary to clear the compressor outlet piping (similar to what A has posted). Then lengthen the wastegate actuator rod to suite. Bolt the wastegate actuator onto that bracket, don't weld it.

:O cheers :ban:

thanks for the input both of you, i've already taken my turbo to a bloke here in SA and bought a new actuator cause i wasn't happy with how i'd set it up for the reasons you'd already stated!

May have cost me a bit more but atleast i'll have peace of mind now!

Good stuff mr_rbman

I can't wait to see how that turbo goes on the RB30 mate.

Let us all know how the setup goes in the end.

Will do, fingers crossed it'll be on the road by the end of the week if nothing else goes wrong.

Anyone else looking at doing an actuator mod, don't mount it off the exhaust housing for the above reasons stated, too much heat for an actuator to handle!

Will do, fingers crossed it'll be on the road by the end of the week if nothing else goes wrong.

Anyone else looking at doing an actuator mod, don't mount it off the exhaust housing for the above reasons stated, too much heat for an actuator to handle!

You could always ceramic heat treat it.

:ban:

turboac12ot.th.jpg turboac24dm.th.jpg turboac32vj.th.jpg turboac47hg.th.jpg turboac56aa.th.jpg

Well here's my new oil and water lines with new actuator bracket, much better than the first mod i did! Couple of little thing left to do but should be on the car shortly!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...