Jump to content
SAU Community

FFS! i crashed my r33 5 days after getting it!


Recommended Posts

Your best bet if your not insured, or insured thrid party, is to carry around cards you've mocked up for a well known law firm, cept obviously with your name and contact details .... it's amazing how much easier people will co-operate without going through insurance if they think you have connections.

;)

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well I suggest getting at least 2 quotes to get the car fixed, with the original bar, (just a quote) then send a copy of both quotes along with a letter to both the insurance agency and the woman. Stating that if no reply is sent within two weeks you will be taking legal action. If they don't, then get a solicitor and take it to court. There was no police on the scene so there is no evidence. They can't check skid marks after the fact. I hope you've got contact's for the witnesses who said it was her fault.

If it goes to court you will win, the only true fact in the case is that she pulled out in front of you. All you have to say is It didn't feel like I was speeding and what ever you do, don't once admit you broke the speed limit. You don't have to say you weren't speeding, just don't say anything. Then sue for legal and repair costs. Then take the money and speed the extra on what ever bar you want.

Sorry to here about the car dude.

I see this sort of stuff everday at work so hope this explains it alittle better and gives you some options if she dont pay up!

1. The other driver was crossing the path of the vehicle with the right of way. Other driver is at fault.This is proved from the points of impact. .ie your front end into her right side.

2. There was no SCIENTIFIC reading of your speed, even the skid marks will have gone by now.Thus making it hard for the other driver or witnessess to prove you were speeding.

3. Because neither car had to be towed it isnt necessarily a police matter, however, if there is greater than i think its between $500 and $1000 damage it can be reported leading to the other driver being fined for a number of things from Failing to give way (2 points) to Negligant driving (3 points) plus the fines. You may be able to persuade the other driver with this information.

4. I know how much it is a pain in the arse that it happened, however, always try to be courteous in your dealings with the other driver and other parties such as insurance copmanies etc. Getting agro wont get you anywhere in a hurry with these kind of ppl. Trust me!

5. Obtain 3 quotes for your damage and present them to the other driver. Giving her the option to pay privately as to avoid insurance premium consequences may invoke her to pay up!

6. Goodluck!!!!!!!!

7. Maybe if your not insured fully yet, do a cheap defensive driver training course. I got intensive driver traing because of my work and to be honest I cant count on both hands and feet the number of times it has saved my precious baby, and perhaps even me from injury!!

Guest | hype^ |

thanx for the info guys..

GOOD NEWS!!!

the lady paid her excess and the insurance company told me to get 2 quotes.. and they'll send a inspector on tuesday to look at the car and tell me what quote to go with...

:P:O :O :lol: :lol:

so by the sounds of things this aint gonna cost me a cent!! :D

so (fingers crossed) i should be commin out cruizing again in the next few weeks..

:uh-huh: :uh-huh:

Hype,

We are running a drive/ cams licence day at Oran Park Next month.

http://forums.skylinesaustralia.com/showth...s=&threadid=585

Its a 2 day course. The first day is a basic drive course like XEQTOR said he did. The second is high speed cornering/braking, track course to help get you round the race track quicker. You get your CAM's licence at the end of the 2 day's which means you can drive at any raceway in OZ. If we get a couple more people the price drops to $570 for the two days.

It migh be a bit much $ but a single basic day is $200 -$300. the two day course is Good value if you ever think you might come to the creek or Oran park one day!

Hype, I've been in many insurance situations and I think this is what is going to happen. Regardless of what you think, her insurance company will say that your in the wrong and will not pay you. This is because from their point of view, she was in front and you should have seen her and been in control.

It doesn't matter how fast or slow your going, if your front hits them your automatically in the wrong.

If it happens again you should get a witness straight away to write out what they saw plus all the usual details.

Just giving you the low down mate!!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...