Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all!

I know this topic has come up before, and I have read them all, but I just need to clarify how would you know

if the ATTESSA-ETS system is working at optimal performance when you buy an R32 GTR?

What would be the signs of a healthy ATTESA-ETS system?

What would be the bad signs of a ATTESA-ETS system that is not working properly?

Cheers guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117257-r32-gtr-attesa-ets-testing/
Share on other sites

Well its easy to tell if the system is all OK, if not the ATTESA light will be on on the dash.

However its much harder to tell if it is really healthy, because even if the system is working fine the centre clutch packs do wear, the system will think it is giving front torque but the actual torque transmitted might be minimal.

If you get the car dynoed in 2WD, leave the dyno unlocked and re-install the fuse and try and drive off the dyno.

If the clutch packs are in good nick, the car will drive straight off. If they are worn or slipping, it will move off more slowly (or not at all).

A subjective test I know, but if the dyno operator sees a lot of GT-Rs, he'll have a pretty good idea.

That's good advice: I'll give it a try!

What wbout the torque gauge? If the needle is slow to pick up when you give it a bit, couldn't that be a sign of an unhealthy attesa system?

I heard a healthy system, snaps the needle quite fast to full front torque load under max rear slippage.

What are your views on bleeding the attesa-ets system? I have heard that corrects many of the problems associated with no or low torque conversion to the front.

How do you know when your clutch packs are wrecked?

All opinions welcome!

Edited by skylimit

Well if the torque gauge is moving slowly that suggests that it is not bleeding or the clutch packs....the gauge reflects what the system is trying to do.

Maybe your longitudinal accelerometer is failing? I've not come across that problem but it must be possible/

Well if the torque gauge is moving slowly that suggests that it is not bleeding or the clutch packs....the gauge reflects what the system is trying to do.

Maybe your longitudinal accelerometer is failing? I've not come across that problem but it must be possible/

The torque gauge actually has nothing to do with the mechanical side of the system. A completely stuffed transfer case will not be indicated by a lazy gauge, as the gauge signal is derived from an electrical output of the ATTESSA ECU it will still work, and should not be relied on.

We use a 80psi pressure gauge on the hydraulic line feeding the transfer case to make sure at least 50psi to 70psi (will vary depending on load) is present when front drive is operated. If this is ok then the transfer case is the problem (clutches worn or hydraulic actuator failure).

Hope this helps. :laugh:

The torque gauge actually has nothing to do with the mechanical side of the system. A completely stuffed transfer case will not be indicated by a lazy gauge, as the gauge signal is derived from an electrical output of the ATTESSA ECU it will still work, and should not be relied on.

We use a 80psi pressure gauge on the hydraulic line feeding the transfer case to make sure at least 50psi to 70psi (will vary depending on load) is present when front drive is operated. If this is ok then the transfer case is the problem (clutches worn or hydraulic actuator failure).

Hope this helps. :)

hey paul do u happen to have a pic of how u plumb in a pressure line off the main hydraulic line??? sounds like a damn good idea and worthwhile as i dont even have a torque split gauge in mine (stagea).

hey paul do u happen to have a pic of how u plumb in a pressure line off the main hydraulic line??? sounds like a damn good idea and worthwhile as i dont even have a torque split gauge in mine (stagea).

its a simple matter of installing a "T" fitting at the rear of the box where line attaches or getting Pirtek or any other reputable hose doctor to install one in the line and cap it off when not in use.

its a simple matter of installing a "T" fitting at the rear of the box where line attaches or getting Pirtek or any other reputable hose doctor to install one in the line and cap it off when not in use.

paul is 100 % correct and its the only real way to test it properly.

hey paul cheers for that, so a regular oil pressure guage will be fine with a 0-100psi readout or does the pressure go higher than 100psi?

also on the r32 system vs the later model ones that hold the pressure..

does that mean the r32 gtr would read 0 psi when not operating 4wd and r33 and 34's would still have how much pressure when in 2wd?

Edited by CruiseLiner
hey paul cheers for that, so a regular oil pressure guage will be fine with a 0-100psi readout or does the pressure go higher than 100psi?

also on the r32 system vs the later model ones that hold the pressure..

does that mean the r32 gtr would read 0 psi when not operating 4wd and r33 and 34's would still have how much pressure when in 2wd?

Yes a 0-100psi gauge will do the trick. As for holding pressure on the later models....its the preload on the clutch plates in the transfer case not the pressure applied to the ATTESSA hydraulic actuator (rear of transfer case) that is the problem on newer models (this is why you cannot dyno R33 + R34 models in 2 whell mode without removing driveshaft). You should have 0psi pressure when in 2wd mode.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...