Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its probably your coil packs. its a common problem in the r33's.

take them out and get the coil packs cleaned on the inside with some steel wool till theyre all nice and shiney on the inside.

its either that or your spark plug gap is too big (although 1.1mm should be fine on standard boost).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117456-boost-issue/#findComment-2160411
Share on other sites

if theyre too far apart on higher boost the spark may get blown out by the force of the air entering the combustion chamber.

if the gap is smaller, the spark will have more of a chance of detonating the air/fuel at the right time as the spark has a smaller distance to travel.

a con of having a smaller gap is the spark wont be as powerful as a spark gapped at 1.1mm. this is why people buy splitfire coil packs and make their gap larger than the .8 that is recommended with standard coil packs.

hope that makes sence :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117456-boost-issue/#findComment-2161498
Share on other sites

yeah I concurr with everything that was just said! buy some XIs from Kudos motoesport in the trader section for 99 delivered...and also have a look at the coild backs for the hairline fracture...get some spitfires if u have the money...overwise do a dodge fix and u wil be set for a while...also while ur at it check ur leads...or just replace them...then u know everything is cool..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117456-boost-issue/#findComment-2164389
Share on other sites

nah they dont need replacing, plus it isnt a dodgy fix if you're cleaning the inside of the coil packs with a dremil or steel wool.

over time they get a build up of crap inside them. this stops the route to the spark plug from being the shortest path to earth (which is how electricity behaves) as the build-up of crap is stopping the coils conduct with the spring properly under load. just clean out the shit inside it and you'll notice a huge difference. make sure you do it carefully though.

i did mine at around the beginning of last year and they were good till last december when i took my car off the road for blowing #6. and im sure they'll be fine for another few years. i even took the tape off when i did it and they worked just as well.. no missfire for a year.

heres what they look like before (not my coil packs):

IMG_4798Medium.jpg

and these are my coil packs after cleaning them:

DSC00577.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117456-boost-issue/#findComment-2164782
Share on other sites

its probably your coil packs. its a common problem in the r33's.

take them out and get the coil packs cleaned on the inside with some steel wool till theyre all nice and shiney on the inside.

its either that or your spark plug gap is too big (although 1.1mm should be fine on standard boost).

thank you for advice :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117456-boost-issue/#findComment-2175498
Share on other sites

Time for a bit more info on this thing :thumbsup: I didn't write a post up about it yet because the car needs to be repaired first (the accident or should I say incident was not her fault in the slightest, long story which I won't go into here). Anyway here's the basic rundown and why I don't think it's the coils.

Firstly, the old coils were good up until about 1 bar of boost, then it would get the misfiring problem at anything higher which I discovered when I had it tuned last year. So I got Splitfire coils which fixed it. Before selling the car I decided to put it back to stock(ish), but tested the old coils at 1 bar first, to make sure that they were still ok. Everything was fine.

So then I put the rest of the stuff I was selling back to stock. Injectors, ECU, AFM. Then I noticed that it was getting the misfire problem again, at about 5000rpm as seems to be the norm. Luckily I still had the Splitfires so I threw them back in to see if that helped, and it didn't make even a slight difference. So I was and still am 99% sure that it's not the coils.

Next thing to test was the AFM. I couldn't put the Q45 AFM and PowerFC back in because they had been sent to their new owners already, but luckily Andrew from Kudos Motorsports sent me a stock replacement express post (thanks Andrew!), and this seemed to make a difference. Instead of misfiring ALL the time, it was now doing it maybe half the time and seemed to be improving. I then decided it was the factory AFM making it run too rich and fouling the plugs, but now with the new AFM it was running correctly and blasting off the carbon.

At this point I decide to put the car on the market, but Emma gets a new job and says she can afford to buy it, so she is driving it around herself for a couple of weeks before she has the incident mentioned above. During that time though we discovered that the misfiring problem was gradually returning. I found that I could lessen the effect by winding the boost down, but gradually it started happening at lower and lower boost. Even though the EBC was set to 0.6, I think that the adjustable wastegate actuator is set to around 0.8 so I don't think we've managed to drop it any lower than that. I would need to road test it to check but obviously that's not possible yet.

Other things I've tried were changing the plugs to new ones, it didn't make any difference and the old ones weren't fouled anyway so now I have a spare set. My current theory is that it's factory boost cut, but I unfortunately don't have a PowerFC anymore to test this theory. The turbo is not stock, it's a 450hp Garrett so this would generate extra problems for the factory ECU. The fact that the misfiring issue is moving around depending mostly on the changing of air flow (boost) or measuring it (AFM) makes me think that the ECU is "learning" how to cut the boost again whenever I change something, similar to how it learns how to idle, and back off timing when it detects detonation. A simple test will be to reset the ECU once it's on the road and see if it improves anything.

I think that's the whole story! I was going to post all this up after the car was back on the road, but Emma's very eager to learn and she thought she'd put the post up about it :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117456-boost-issue/#findComment-2175810
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...