Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have one request though, as shane is keen to take me for a run in the R cause i cant decide which model to buy, Andy you have to take me for a run too man

Okay

Oi !

:D

lies :P

See how ansty they get? They know it is true

Do either of you two even remember what it is like to turn the key of your car and hear it start?? :P

yeh better go in andy's first, caus you dont wanna start of in a fast car and then go to a super slow one :P

:dry:

Oi !

:P

c'mon scuba schteeve! you know it's true :D:dry:

It can be done in a day.... easily! Well you know it's still hard wrok, but time won't be an issue, I don't think anyway

ps.. you will be eating steak at 7pm covered in grease still! It takes at least a week to clean up the last of htat shit!

*koolaid voice* oh yeaaaaah!

Bye Annaaaaaa!

ciao little fella! *pops turdy in handbag*

Shane think i am leaning moretowards the 32 hey, just cant get away from that look they have when you put mofo big tyres under them

they certainly do have an aggressive stance dont they...my suggestion you, buy a cheap one and get the engine rebuilt, or buy one that already has a bung engine...or buy a recently built one :dry:

It can be done in a day.... easily! Well you know it's still hard wrok, but time won't be an issue, I don't think anyway

ps.. you will be eating steak at 7pm covered in grease still! It takes at least a week to clean up the last of htat shit!

ha ha cool! Well that hogs breath is used to us making a scene there...hey Liz?

Shane think i am leaning moretowards the 32 hey, just cant get away from that look they have when you put mofo big tyres under them

GTR?? Cause GTSTs are poo with the RB20

they certainly do have an aggressive stance dont they...my suggestion you, buy a cheap one and get the engine rebuilt, or buy one that already has a bung engine...or buy a recently built one :dry:

Yeah i sort of wanted to get one with lowish K's but...but will keep it in mind.....However if i do get for only 20K and i have budgeted for one thats about 36 (simon from SVI reckons ill need this much for a low K V-spec 2) i reckon i could make it go ok for the rest

there are good things about GTS's but such as 2wd, sideways is always good

oh dear... *sigh* get yourself a GTR... then you'll see how very sideways they can be :P

Alright, I really AM going this time. Bye :dry:

oh dear... *sigh* get yourself a GTR... then you'll see how very sideways they can be :D

Alright, I really AM going this time. Bye :dry:

Sounds like you wish you guys had brought a GTR now?

I know it sounds like i want to thrash my car but after waiting so long to get one i dont think i will wring its neck too many times

See ya :P

Edited by SLO-89
I know it sounds like i want to thrash my car but after waiting so long to get one i dont think i will wring its neck too many times

u'll say that at the start, but then the bug will bite, and it'll bite hard!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...