Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What sorta power should i be getting @ the wheels out of my RB20DET ECCS with the following mods :

* 3 inch dump pipe into a 3 inch hi-flow cat, 3.5 inch zorst from the cat back

* 10 psi of boost

* k & n pod type air filter

I got it dynoed and wasnt too impressed with the outcome, not that i was expecting big horsepower but this wasnt much of an improvement from the standard power output. I got 160hp @ the wheels.

You guys reckon this is a pretty accurate reading or is the something wrong with the car?

cheers

sLo :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11982-what-sorta-power-should-i-be-getting/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

power? you should use 240V AC if your in Australia.

Seriously, don't worry about comparing dyno figures except with your own from the same day and dyno.

Is 160rwhp too low? Probably not. Why don't you see how fast you car is. If it's too slow for you modify it some more.

If beating other people in a dyno comparison is what you like to do then knock yourself out.

I had exactly the same mods and made 109kw at the wheels with 10psi.

I will not put my car on the dyno again unless I have added a substantial mod and want to see what I have gained or am getting something tuned at the time.

Trying to keep a handle on maintanence negates me modding extensively at present.

I feel slow sometimes and when that happens I go drive my g/f's mirage or someother sh*tbox and then get back in my car again. Trust me you will feel the difference!

edit-sorry, tell a lie I only had a catback on the dyno.

slo-32 - I got 114rwkw when i had mine done last Thursday. Had the same problem as you with timing i saw in an earlier post of yours, except my timing had been set wrong. Started at 70kw and i thought what the! after that they realised the timing had been set wrong and ended up getting 114 :( very happy with it.

Mods i have are pod and turbo back exhaust and running 14psi i think on the Apexi AVC-R i had installed on the same day. Nor unless they did the power run at 12psi, but dont think so. Cant wait to see what it'll do with a few more mods i wanna do like cooler and bigger turbo :D

BTW - what is conversion of hp to rwkw?

Mine was 143rwkw with Trust element in the stock airbox, HKS Super Drager cat back exhaust and Supra front mount cooler, stock boost.

With a pod filter, front pipe, custom FMIC it made 153rwkw at stock boost

Chris

itsallgood : 160rwhp = 119rwkw i think...well around that

Chris32 :

With a pod filter, front pipe, custom FMIC it made 153rwkw at stock boost
... 153 rwkw?! You sure you dont mean hp? Surely a FMIC doesnt give you that much power does it? Correct me if i'm wrong.

Cheers

sLo :P

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by sLo-32

itsallgood : 160rwhp = 119rwkw i think...well around that

Chris32 :  ... 153 rwkw?! You sure you dont mean hp? Surely a FMIC doesnt give you that much power does it? Correct me if i'm wrong.  

Cheers  

sLo :P

yes u r very wrong, fmic gives u about 30rwkw gain at same boost level over stock cooler.

Stock cooler is the biggest restriction in the whole system.

I remember alot of ppl saying a fmic doesn't really do shit with a 32? Either way i should have mine back (fkn taxi ran me off the road) in around another month. She comes back with a micks metalcraft 600x300x76 so ill be able to comment :P

With stockbox, 3" exhaust str8 thru, 10 psi, and timing on around 30 (no pingage pphhoaarrwww) we were on around 138rwkw.

What have other ppl noticed that have swapped to a fmic in a 32?

I've run 35degrees base timing on regular bp98. About 25-30degress at the moment.

fmic will always make a difference. The peak power will be higher for sure. The only problem is some 'oversized' fmic packages will lose response over the factory and make the car slower to accellerate over 400m.

Originally posted by INASNT

people who say fmic dont make a difference obiliously dont have one or have even had one!

I agree with you totally, though from everything ive read, suggests that without say a new turbo etc, changing the IC on a 32 doesn't make a great deal of difference.

Now ive seen 100 of ure posts saying "omg my fmic gave me 30wrkw" :D, im just wondering what i should be expecting...5? 10? 30?

Yes INASNT...I have never had a FMIC. In fact this is my first turbo car and still learning alot about them. And I am learning a great deal from you guys at this forum.

The only reason i questioned the power gain from a FMIC is becuase i've been in a s14 with a cooler and one without and the one without went alot harder / better. And they pretty much had the same mods. But i now know there is many factors that could have made this be.

Thanks again

sLo :D

I never dyno'd it with the stock cooler, but I reckon it was around 120rwkw. As I said before, with the 7MGTE Supra cooler it made 143rwkw, and with a proper custom job it made 153rwkw. All with no change to the stock boost.

Currently its making 198rwkw with a HKSGT2510 and a re-mapped computer and decent intercooler.

I'd recommend a bigger intercooler to any one with a stock cooler, the amount of extra grunt thats lost through the stock cooler is a joke, and retaining it is also a joke - bigger is better!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...