Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As far as I've had it explained to me the factory ecu works as follows from the engine speed input and the air flow meter input the ECU calculates a pulse width that should give a stochiometric air:fuel ratio ie 14.7:1. The with that speed and air flow information it looks up a table which contains a number. That number is a multiplier for the pulse width. I do not know for certain, but I don't think that the multiplier can be less than one, ie acts to shorted the pulse width with should give an leaner mixture then 14.7:1.

If you are running in closed loop mode, the ECU can run leaner, but anything over about 30% load/throttle and the ECU will not enter closed loop mode, ie the 02 sensor isn't even looked at most of the time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12044-o2-sensor/#findComment-214101
Share on other sites

Adding to the above, the oxygen sensor (I'm assuming you are talking about the one off the exhaust?) is not the only one that the ECU makes it decision, and its a balance of that, AFM sensor, the intake air temp (before the intake manifold), and THR position (butterfly open/close %). Then of course it has to work out how much fuel is going in, boost levels, etc.

Its a complex equation thats for sure!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12044-o2-sensor/#findComment-214135
Share on other sites

The only time you should have noticed the O2 sensor was faulty would be on 'cruise' (constatnt throttle, constant speed). On a WOT ie accelerating, which most dyno runs are, the O2 sensor would be out of the equation. Nissan programs the ECU to run rich-as on WOT.

So its possible the dyno operator was having a lend of you.

I have replaced mine - for a different reason - and it cost about $150 from Nissan (its a NGK unit, so you might try contacting NGK).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12044-o2-sensor/#findComment-220863
Share on other sites

im in the middle of building an Air/Fuel meter from one of those jaycar kits. it says the chip in the kit is matched to a particular bosch o2 sensor (making it not perfectly accurate with other o2 sensors). this is because of the skew of the lamda values outside stichiometric ratio (14.7) can be different between various sensors.

anyway to use this accurately on my r31 im going to have to reprogram the PIC chip mappings

hence i think you need an o2 sensor which reports similar lamda values to the original one (for the factory ecu)

mine is rattling (ie stuffed - the sensor inside is broken in half) and i'm planning to go the NGK ones for my RB30 which was $130 repco

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12044-o2-sensor/#findComment-224866
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...