Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

In all honesty is theer any gain noticed with a CAI setup for a pod?

it has the same concept as an intercooler...

turbo heats up the charged air, the cooler it comes in at, the cooler it'll leave, less work for the intercooler .. etc etc

do you really see a pod system creating a Vacuum enough to implode the surrounding box?

if the feed os 80mm or more then you shouldn't see any issue..

plus most people running CAI are running boxes that are far from perfectly sealed anyway..

from the first post, i missed that its made of PVC ... i dont think it'll like the heat too much, plsu how do you propose to join the piping to the funnel etc ..

yeah, heat shield + cold air intake! I agree, a little hot air is better than not enought air, espesially when you have a FMIC and it will be cooled anyway!

cops are pretty soft on mods down here... just hard on dickhead drivers!

i dont believe there is such a thing as not enough hot air

the stock airbox and snorkel will suck in the required amount of air.

if you feel its a restriction then fit a higher flowing filter.

sucking in hot air is a bad thing

Hey guys, pretty intresting to see all different CAI systems but to spent $180 - $250 just on the CAI then + $100 for a decent POD is bit over my budget...

Im going to start researching into different materials that could be used to make my CAI design..

I like the PVC funnel idea... quite creative! would love to hear some moe ideas

Cheers

Exactly Paul! As if a custom 3" CAI with a fully sealed POD enclosure isnt going to give you a much better air flow/suction then the standard box! Of coarse it will...

Edited by QRI05E
Does anyone know the legal side of using a POD in NSW??? is it still a defect if its partitioned/boxed???

Cheers

if it is boxed and they cannot see it, legally it still must be able to pass the EPA sound emmissions test. so induction noise is covered within that.

At the moment it is a defect & $70 fine. There is talk about repeat offenders being punished with a demerit point. If it is modified from standard then it has to be engineered, then technically it is street legal. Depends on the cop, ive seen engineered cars get defected all the same. But id rather spend the money and get the filter enclosed and legal rather than copping a couple of fines and then having to outlay the money. It also surprises me that you would consider putting some rough looking pvc ducting in your car, $17000 plus sports cars and always looking for the cheapest option. pvc piping, $400 intercooler kits, $22 bleed valves, absolutely amazes me.

Thats alright then... you can line the inside of the partition/box with thin foam which will reduce the induction noise.. but i love the sound of a skyline comming onto boost :) lol

Sounds like you are some kind of mechanical engineer or something, suggest you dont post rubbish like this, makes you look stupid.

yeah, heat shield + cold air intake! I agree, a little hot air is better than not enought air, espesially when you have a FMIC and it will be cooled anyway!

cops are pretty soft on mods down here... just hard on dickhead drivers!

i personally would rather lose a tiny amount of power due to hot air being sucked in, than lose more power by not sucking enough air. if the cai setup will definately supply enough air then fine but i'd rather be safe then sorry.

Edited by mad082

They run a 4" intake, have you seen the standard intake on a airbox? and its about avoiding $70 fines and defects also. My customers would be pretty pissed if i fitted a pod and then he went out and got defected. What you guys do on your own cars is your business, but dont advise other people incorrectly as it will cost them money.

i personally would rather lose a tiny amount of power due to hot air being sucked in, than lose more power by not sucking enough air. if the cai setup will definately supply enough air then fine but i'd rather be same then sorry.

well everyone should know the rules for their state, so if everyone would like to post up the rulings for the different states so that people who don't know can find out.

i'm in qld and according to the 'hoon' squad up here that pulled me over, all you need for a pod to be legal in qld is a fixed mounting bracket for it.

and something i just thought about is if you have a sealed box with just a pipe coming from the front bar, and that pipe is foward facing and in the open, and if you are driving in heavy rain and following cars then you are going to get an airbox full of water. i'd suggest putting a 5mm hole in the bottom of the airbox to let water drain out. it would have to be a real prick of a cop to book you for it, and if you made it at the back of the box where it can't be seen there is less chance of the cop seeing it.

i personally would rather lose a tiny amount of power due to hot air being sucked in, than lose more power by not sucking enough air. if the cai setup will definately supply enough air then fine but i'd rather be safe then sorry.

As Paul said its better to have the pod completely sealed from underbonnet air intake. The pod will suck enough air if it have a single 3inch feed. The second you open it up to underbonnet air there is no point having the cold air feed, it'll start sucking air in through the path of least resistance - i. the holes into the engine bay.

And you'll lose more power from increased air intake temps than from a slight pressure drop from the intake system. I know (at least from working with air compressors) that a 3 degree increase in intake air temp decreases power by about 1%. So it

Cold air intakes are most important at low speeds and when taking off. The faster you are going, the less a cold air intake is needed as more air is forced into the engine bay anyway. And the second you increase speed, the pressure drop across the inlet pipe will decrease due to the air being forced into the intake piping - the ram air effect.

It also surprises me that you would consider putting some rough looking pvc ducting in your car, $17000 plus sports cars and always looking for the cheapest option. pvc piping, $400 intercooler kits, $22 bleed valves, absolutely amazes me.

To answer your comment, products such as intercoolers, CAI, bleed valves are all non mechanical and non electrical devices.. How can you justify spending the extra $$$ for the a near identical product that does the same job??? Fair enough the name brands might be bit more appealing in appearance but to compare a CAI costing $50 or spending $300 on a name brand and both do the same job is not logical.. and might i add there is nothing wrong with those $400 FMIC kits and $22 boost controllers..

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...