Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was going to make the same topic about a racing chip 4 my r33

my mates have been telling me to install a chip

but i have no idea who does it wat brand i should use and how much it would cost so if anyone could help in this thread it would be great

you are better off getting a chip burnt or safc tuned for your specific car than installing a one size fits all chip. alot of the chips out of japan are not good for australian fuels because they are tuned for 101 octane fuel. the jap ones run too much ignition timing and are often dangerous.

Given that its NA and you're probably not running a stripped down engine, I'd look at a piggyback. At a bolt-on level of tune the gains from going to a standalone ECU aren't worth the cost.

A'PEXi SAFC, Unichip (if they make one for your RB25DE), or the GReddy eManage / HKS F-Con etc would be fine. You'd then need to get it tuned.

But, as everyone else has said, don't get a "one size fits all" ECU. Its not tuned for your mods, so you'll either not get all the gains you could (which makes it a waste of time and money) or at worst it'll damage something.

If your car doesn't have any other mods, you'd be better off getting a catback exhaust before touching the ECU.

itll do bugger all. if you could magically reprogram the ecu and suddenly your car noticably better for racing then that would be so lovely, but if you could make the car that much better with the ecu alone, nissan would have made it like that. itll hardly make your car faster, it probably wont change you laptimes around a track etc. if you don't know that much about cars you probably wouldnt even notice a difference. to get more power out of an na 33 takes money, and you WONT get easy gains like a turbo car. you could put a full exhaust system on and make less power. you might make more. it might stay the same. Turbo it or spend $$$$$ making the RB25DE go harder (still not as hard as a turbo) OR....spend your money on things that will noticably make your car better for "racing", depending on your idea of the term..... (not the red light variety). My meaning would involve actually driving round corners.

For an NA 33, in order of how much it will improve your speed.

1. Driver training - skidpans/trackdays/motorkhanas/anything that involvers performance driving with tuition/supervision. That, and developing your understanding of the mechanics/dynamics of a car.

2. Suspension

3. Brakes

Helpful note: People that say "you should put a racing chip in it" have no idea, or are making fun of you. And if you are talking to someone who knows cars and you say that your 33 GTS has a racing chip you're going to look like an idiot.

on my NA 300zx i gained 22rwkw just from SAFC tune. no ignition timing increase. the reason nissan could not make their cars with the "ideal tuning" is because they have to run everything very safely because alot of people don't look after their cars. look at how rich factory ECU's run. NA 300zx's ideal A/F ratio is around 12.8:1, i imagine this would be not too dissimilar to NA skylines. my car before tuning was running at 10.5:1. it will make your car go faster, it will change your lap times, you will notice the difference, and you will save noticeably on fuel. it will make the car nicer to drive daily with more low-mid range torque. yes brakes and suspension are important, but i doubt that he is talking about racing his car on the track, more likely he is just using the term "racing chip" as a descriptor for modifying the ECU settings.

itll do bugger all. if you could magically reprogram the ecu and suddenly your car noticably better for racing then that would be so lovely, but if you could make the car that much better with the ecu alone, nissan would have made it like that. itll hardly make your car faster, it probably wont change you laptimes around a track etc. if you don't know that much about cars you probably wouldnt even notice a difference. to get more power out of an na 33 takes money, and you WONT get easy gains like a turbo car. you could put a full exhaust system on and make less power. you might make more. it might stay the same. Turbo it or spend $$$$$ making the RB25DE go harder (still not as hard as a turbo) OR....spend your money on things that will noticably make your car better for "racing", depending on your idea of the term..... (not the red light variety). My meaning would involve actually driving round corners.

For an NA 33, in order of how much it will improve your speed.

1. Driver training - skidpans/trackdays/motorkhanas/anything that involvers performance driving with tuition/supervision. That, and developing your understanding of the mechanics/dynamics of a car.

2. Suspension

3. Brakes

Helpful note: People that say "you should put a racing chip in it" have no idea, or are making fun of you. And if you are talking to someone who knows cars and you say that your 33 GTS has a racing chip you're going to look like an idiot.

Yes you right cookie300zx, im not gonna race on the track against other Skylines because i will probably have my arse handed to me, but hey gotta start somewhere right. I was meaning having the ECU modified. What is with the different geear ratios eg 12.8:1 & 10.5:1, what does that mean in plain english?

on my NA 300zx i gained 22rwkw just from SAFC tune. no ignition timing increase. the reason nissan could not make their cars with the "ideal tuning" is because they have to run everything very safely because alot of people don't look after their cars. look at how rich factory ECU's run. NA 300zx's ideal A/F ratio is around 12.8:1, i imagine this would be not too dissimilar to NA skylines. my car before tuning was running at 10.5:1. it will make your car go faster, it will change your lap times, you will notice the difference, and you will save noticeably on fuel. it will make the car nicer to drive daily with more low-mid range torque. yes brakes and suspension are important, but i doubt that he is talking about racing his car on the track, more likely he is just using the term "racing chip" as a descriptor for modifying the ECU settings.

if u take a closer look how SAFC works, u are advancing the ignition timing when u lean it down

if u take a closer look how SAFC works, u are advancing the ignition timing when u lean it down

cuold you explain that in more detail please. my base timing is set at 15 degrees (stock for 300zx NA) so could you explain how the ignition timing is being advanced by leaning out the AF ratio?

I saw a "LAP" chip for an rb25de on just jap's used electronics section

maybe this is the kind of thing you're after?

http://www.justjap.com/parts_uelectronics.htm

those are the things i was saying you should not be buying. would be tuned for JAP fuel, and you have no idea what the AF ratios and ignition timing would be set at! could be rather dangerous, and you won't get the same gains as a chip/piggy back that has been tuned for your car

Edited by cookie300zx

Personally i think if your going to keep your NA for a while and you love your car it can be a good idea to go for an ecu tune.

If your just going to do simple mods like exhaust&intake mods I would expect that you could certainly expect more power from getting your ecu modded.Put it this way, on my rb20de with 2 1/4 inch exhaust and k&n pod i made 85kw@wheels. Then the timing was advanced just a few degrees and it consistantly jumped up to 89rwkw's. When they mod your ecu they will generally change both your fuel and ignition maps together. If your going to run 98ron fuel all of the time then they would likely advance your timing right throughout the rev range as well as lean out your afr's a bit depending what they look like. I would say you could get maybe 6 or 7rwkw's out of it if it was done well.But thats just a rough estimate. wouldnt expect to much more than that.

The place im getting my rb20 ecu tuned for my turbo setup doesn't do rb25 ecu's yet.

Ohh and my old u12 pinny ka24e made 3.8fwkw's more after just timing advance so it gives you an idea of the extent of which tuning will effect the power of your NA.

  • 4 weeks later...

I have a rb30... Im yet to work out what it has done except add about 5rwkw. Tested it on a dyno but i just cant work out what it changed! Fuel consumption has stayed roughly the same and as far as i can tell the timing hasnt changed... The car runs a little smoother and i was told it would help elliminate any dark smoke but I didnt have much in the first place. Picked it up for $40 so i thought id give it a go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...