Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Basically cancelled due to the fact there is no cages or anything needed. Buller and Lake Mountain etc are all still fine. Same with the other Targa events. It's just the Race to the Pie that's been canned.

And if I'm honest I kinda have to agree with the decision. There was nothing to stop Leewah and his 600awkw GT-R with NOS plumbed in running this event with no cage - which is kinda crazy.

that sux

if ppl wanna unsafely run the event, let them at their own risk. if they die, so be it. they obviously dont care, so why should we?

as long as no one else besides the driver can get killed/injured whilst racing, it should be fine.

if ppl wanna unsafely run the event, let them at their own risk. if they die, so be it. they obviously dont care, so why should we?

as long as no one else besides the driver can get killed/injured whilst racing, it should be fine.

Because their next of kin can be a bunch of gold digging scum and sue the event organisers for not protecting the idiot against themselves.

Its stupid. We live in such a car oriented country thanks to our useless public transport yet the government then tries to crack down on illegal car-based enjoyment without setting up some affordable legal alternatives.

What else are people going to do if you don't give them a legal venue to go enjoy their cars, that they can afford to go to?

that sux

if ppl wanna unsafely run the event, let them at their own risk. if they die, so be it. they obviously dont care, so why should we?

as long as no one else besides the driver can get killed/injured whilst racing, it should be fine.

Are you serious ? :mellow:

It has nothing to do with ppl wanting to run their cars thinking "she will be right" ...or i dont care if i die :mad:

It has to do with the fact that even the best drivers make mistakes. Regulations are based on the style of event and ensuring that the cars running are suitable.

Sit back and think for a minute. The speeds of the normal production car is scary these days. So dont be surprised if their needs to be a re-think in the devices / safety equipment required to be fitted to cars.

Noone is ever going to make you do motorkhanas with cages etc. And typically hill climbs have been fine for road cars as well. But the speeds that turbocharged AWD cars can now get up to...well they are now approaching the speeds of highly modded cars from 10-15 years ago. The specials are still BS fast, but you get my point concerning the speed of road cars.

The topic of driving cars at the speeds we do should not be trivialised. And the organisers are in charge of the event and responsible for setting out a fun and competitive event. Part of that is considering the classes of cars that are to run, the points/handicaps, the licences required to compete.

Sitting back and casting dispersions is easy. Professionals crash cars, just like Joe Blow. Its racing so you push. Some events have higher associated risk and need to be treated as such.

This event was one such event that would have been tricky, as the number of lanes and the speeds cars would have seen on the stretch of road probably put it in a different category of motorspot.

Its the fact that ppl are building far faster cars these days, with no improvement in safety other then the inherent safety gear of the manufacturer (Hell most remove air bags) then there is always going to be a major re-think/shake up sooner or later. Otherwise they woudl still be running F1 races with hay on the side of the road and on your local streets

Anyway,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...