Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

"Rich and Retard" is simply the higher air flow/load cells having no ignition timing in them, and the fuel cells at this load are rich.

That is why it cuts, no timing in those load cells.

If you could remap the ecu to put some extra ignition timing in those load cells, you wouldn't have a rich and retard situation.

The TI monitor is more then likely a signal for a trip computer to calculate show current fuel usage.

Also the lack of the throttle switch input, will not matter as the RB25 PowerFC uses the throttle position sensor, not switch. (So it won't matter that its not there.)

From what you have found Cubes, all you have to do is reverse pins 112 & 114 and cut 57 to be safe. (I doubt this pin is connected in the PowerFC though?)

Interesting, well as soon as I find out if my pfc is fried or not I'll throw an rb25 pfc in to it.

Seems almost too easy.

kwazza11, Can I ask you if you did the install your self or had some one else do it. I know you did said 'you' switched the two inj. outputs on the loom. Just to double check it was indeed you who did the work as then I know your not leaving something out. :whistling:

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I had a look at Bl4ck32's PFC this morning, it too has the little cut disabling ecu pin 57.

So it appears AP Engineering do indeed use one of the rb25 revisions (possibly an early one as the ap engineering pfc uses the early hand controllers) swap the two injector outputs and disable the pin 57.

Cubes, yep i installed it myself and all i did was swap the two injector wires around, the throttle switch is only used for kick-down on autos and the exhaust temp signal (57) i assume is used for the exhaust temp light to indicate a blocked cat, thats been disconnected. everything else has been explained, Ti monitor for trip computer, boost control etc.

was a massively simple exercise, plugged it in, drove it to the tuner's workshop, got it tuned, drive away! :)

the throttle switch is only used for kick-down on autos

Actually I think pin 54 is a throttle closed switch which the RB20 ECU uses to go into idle mode. The throttle sensor box thingy also contains a WOT (probably closer to 75%) switch that from what I can remember is connected to the auto trans and not used by the ecu.

However if the RB25 ecu doesn't need that exact throttle closed signal to determine when it should be idling, then I can't see a problem leaving it disconnected.

The mosfets were fine however the capacitors and resistors had been fried, I did pick some of the tinny little resistors that can hardly been seen were replaced.

All capacitors were replaced as well as resistors. He said I was 'very' lucky. :nyaanyaa:

A few pics of before and after.

post-382-1151992033.jpg

post-382-1151992043.jpg

post-382-1151992050.jpg

post-382-1151992060.jpg

The mosfets were fine however the capacitors and resistors had been fried, I did pick some of the tinny little resistors that can hardly been seen were replaced.

All capacitors were replaced as well as resistors. He said I was 'very' lucky. :nyaanyaa:

A few pics of before and after.

Anybody know what the external memory expansion socket/pins are for?

the newer powefcs have a white connector on the board for rom flash upgrades. no idea what the memory expansion is for.

i would expect djetro and pro versions have simply different firmware as they are just code logic changes, wouldnt think it would need more memory or extra chips? seems logical anyway

tops that you got it fixed, is the tune still present ?

damn lucky and cheap to fix might i add, good stuff

Reverse polarity...

How would this affect what you are stating above..

I must admit when I asked how were the mosfets he did say 'suprisingly fine'.

I dont think reverse polarity would be the issue, im not really familiar with the story of yours failing.

Vibration or excessive PCB flexing tend to be a big cause of failures in things like car amps.

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...