Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1989 Nissan Skyline BNR32 GTR

130,000kms

Modifications include:

HKS 2530 turbo chargers (640hp)

HKS Turbo dump pipes

HKS Actuators

HKS Air filters

HKS Fuel rail & injectors

Malpassi fuel pressure regulator

Apex`i Power FC computer and commander (hand held controller)

Apex`i boost control kit for the Power FC

100mm thick intercooler

Nismo coppermix twin plate clutch (latest version)

Nismo aluminium radiator

N1 front bar vents

Twin custom 3” front pipes, into 3.5” exhaust system

Turbo timer

R33 V-Spec differential

R33 gearbox (fitted last week, opened and inspected, low kms, A1 cond)

Cusco brake master stopper

Cusco oversize sway bars

Cusco rear strut brace

Front strut brace

Billstein adjustable suspension

17x9 Rays engineering TE37's

4WD/2WD in-cabin switch

Pioneer CD player

MOMO ‘race’ steering wheel

Reflective tinted windows

This car has recently been dyno tuned to 556hp @ 1.2bar and the power output chart from this tune can be provided. In 2005, tuned to to 260KW at the wheels, the previous owner ran a 11.8sec quarter mile , the car hasn't been re-run since the recent modifications.

As it is, this is a very fast and drivable car while still retaining it's factory look and feel.

Over $15,000 spent in modifications in the last 6 months, I am currently building a track car and need more cash to do so.

Asking $27,500 with 3 months rego

I am interested in swapping for a RWD turbo nissan for a daily driver

Contact Phil on 0402448987 for any further details/interest ([email protected]) - Located in Adelaide, SA

Thanks

post-3402-1153036983.jpg

post-3402-1153037009.jpg

post-3402-1153037036.jpg

Edited by Crimmo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/126330-1989-nissan-skyline-bnr32-gtr/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...