Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

because the gearboxes between NA and Turbo are different...

hence a lot more little things need changing.

If the NA gearbox could be retained (i dont know how long it would/could last)

theoretically, you could just unbolt the engine from the gearbox, unplug all the wiring and accessories and undo the engine mounts and lift the engine out. replace it with det engine (using your old NA engine mounts) swap the ecu and fuel pump with ones from a 25det. rig up the intercooler and drive away...

i suggest you try and find out if keeping the r33 NA gearbox isnt a crazy idea first - could save a lot of money and extra work.

I was lucky to have DamqikGTST who lives only a few doors down offer his help (wouldnt have attempted it without him).

It wouldnt take long to do in a workshop with a hoist etc

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok back to the topic of supercharging(sorry to interupt) funkey monkey put forward this conversion.the easiest supercharger to bolt on is the Toyota 1GZE SC. Its made for a 2.5L straight 6 (or was that 2.0L) the only thing you have to do is get a custom manifold fabricated. Smack on an GTR intercooler and a cold air intake and you've got a 50% power increase.

would anyone have a rough idea on what this would cost.....can get a decent sized fmic for like 500 so what would the other prices be??

lol that's exactly what i was gonna do (b4 i decided to get the GTR)

manifold costs about $800 to fabricate from scratch. Supercharger costs about $250 from a local wrecker. Intercooler will set you back about $800 or so for a GTR intercooler. Add about $500 for labour and piping. and ther's ya supercharged skyline, ready to much stock GTSt's 4 breakfast :P

neoGT-25

jus readign back... u sed insurance stopped u from turbo'ing... i think insurance companies stop you from forced induction... which includes supercharging.

an SC like the 1GZE SC wouldn't affect the internals mucly, its like putting the stock turbo on a GTSt onto the engine, its sorta built to withstand it. As for exhaust n stuff, you'd have increased back pressure, but you don't new headers or anything, coz its a sc

you need to relocate the airconditioning system, that's about it. doesn't take much. One of my mates who's a mechanic drew up a diagram where it goes almost in the same spot as the turbo, its feasable... i'd scan it but i dunno where i put the scrap piece of paper.

it does sound like a more unique option and a bigger "WOW" effect ......

ok .... so we've heard all the "goods" about sc option, what about the down sides to the sc option???apart from costs.... will the engine deteriorate faster then a turboed car, cos its not really made for forced induction?? or are the extra stresses put on the NA engine still within the NA'z limits???

also back to the gear box disscussion....... i gots an 96' R33 ser.II GTS4, hows the gear box in those cars??.. are they the same as the RB25DE(RWD) n RB20DE????.... i just thought being a 4WD car it might be stronger???? maybe?? i dunno????

Originally posted by funkymonkey

...............As for exhaust n stuff, you'd have increased back pressure, but you don't new headers or anything, coz its a sc

so does this mean u might need to down size the exhaust???

sorry if this sounds like a stoopid question.......my bad:rolleyes:

dunno about compression changes, I gave up investigating it when I decided to buy the GTR...

No what I meant is, as the SC setup didn't affect the way my extractors worked, (Ie have exhaust run thr the turbine like a turbo) I could keep the extractors that I already had. I already have aftermarket Fujitsubo extractors on mine worth about 1.5k so I'm not too keen on gettin rid of em. Hence why I was lookin at SC's coz they're less complicated and need less modifications than a turbocharger.

If you really want, buy my car and I'll help u supercharge it :)

u might need to upsize the exhaust, just like if you were puttin a turbo on.

A supercharger does the EXACT same thign a turbo charger does, except a supercharger is driven by a belt attached to the engine, and the Turbocharger is driven by exhaust gasses spinning the turbine.

Everything else is the same, you still need an intercooler to cool the air b4 induction (altho on an SC its not essential), and you still need a bigger exhaust to get rid of the increased byproducts of combustion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...