Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.autoblog.com/2005/11/27/next-91...rbine-geometry/

http://digg.com/tech_news/Porsche_s_new_tu...ogy_for_the_911

Next 911 Turbo to feature Variable Turbine Geometry

November 16 of this year marked the day a century ago that Dr. Alfred Buchi received the first patent for an exhaust gas turbocharger. Porsche will be celebrating the turbo's 100-year anniversary a little late when it introduces the next 911 Turbo sometime next year with Variable Turbine Geometry. This technology allows the angle of the compressor's turbine blades to continually adjust. While some diesel engines have enjoyed this technology since the Nineties, the higher exhaust gas temperatures created by gasoline engines necessitated the creation of new heat-resistant materials to handle the hotness. Porsche and Borg Warner Turbo Systems were able to overcome the heat issue and have developed a VTG turbo system that will be incorporated into the next 911 Turbo. The VTG turbo will allow Porsche's flat-six to mimic a twin-turbo setup with a much broader torque curve and more flexible powerband than a standard single turbo could provide on its own. Power ratings for the new VTG turbo engine haven't been released and probably won't be until the new 911 Turbo surfaces sometime next year.

2051115.002.mini1L.jpg

I'd love to see a working diagram of one of these turbos in more detail.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127801-variable-turbine-geometry/
Share on other sites

I'd love to see a working diagram of one of these turbos in more detail.

Your wish is my command.

http://www.porsche.com/all/masterwerk/flas...&height=513

Click Masterwerk once the Flash demo has finished loading.

Then under Act One click Variable Turbine Geometry.

I thought the new 997 Turbo was running twin VTG's. Its only a single?

While I realise that using a VTG system can mimic a twin-turbo setup with a much broader torque curve and more flexible powerband than a standard single turbo could provide on its own....it begs the question, why not just run twin turbos? Occams Razor, etc......

On any V engine (and a boxer engine especially), you hit plumbing problems with a single turbo. What's the benefit of going back to a single turbine rather than running a pair of turbines?

Imagine this engine with a pair of VTG turbos?

It's not the turbine blades that move on VNT turbos, it's the blades around the edge of the turbine that direct the exhaust gas on to it. It'd be impossible to do it the other way around.

Correct. In commercial aircraft engines they are called Nozzle Guide Vanes ( NGV's ) in the turbine or Variable Inlet Guide Vanes ( VIGV's ) in the Compressor. They change the angle of attack of the air going into the blades ( vanes in the case of turbo's ). Keeping in mind that in aircraft engines, the geometry of the turbine is not variable because of reliability and cost.

I'll be very interested to see how this goes into the future !!

The engine is going to need to run VERY cleanly to stop the guide vanes from siezing up with carbon build-up and I would imagine that the turbo service life on the new 911 would probably be an overhaul at something like 60,000km intervals.

The engine is going to need to run VERY cleanly to stop the guide vanes from siezing up with carbon build-up and I would imagine that the turbo service life on the new 911 would probably be an overhaul at something like 60,000km intervals.

Latest article I read, Porsche quotes 161,000km (100,00miles) for replacement or complete overhaul of the turbos :

Latest article I read, Porsche quotes 161,000km (100,00miles) for replacement or complete overhaul of the turbos :

I'd be extremely impressed if they can hold to that !!! ( and maintain full operating efficiency ).

These Garret VNT turbos have been around for about twenty years, nothing really new here.

They are not really suitable for petrol engines which is why Garret are pushing their GT ball bearing turbos for performance petrol engines, and the VNT turbos only for diesel engines. If these things worked as well as people think they do, companies like HKS would be offering them.

I ran a Garret VNT turbo on my Ford Laser for around two years so I can speak from plenty of practical experience.

You can order one from any Nissan dealer, part number is 14411-VC100 (charger assy-turbo). Back in 2003 it cost me $1454.55.

These variable vane turbos are the standard turbo fitted to the 4.0 litre Nissan Patrol diesel engine in Australia, and that particular engine produces 150Kw, so they are a rather small turbo. Two of these would be required on a larger engine.

Porsche seem to have made it work, where nobody else has. No doubt it took a lot of fairly sophisticated engine management and a lot of development. Don't think you can just bolt one on to your Skyline and get the same sort of results without the control system to make it work properly. There is far more to it han just hooking up a standard wastegate actuator to the vane control arm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should. But it already uses too much fuel for a daily. You might note my recco for engine chnages are almost exclusively to people who have it as a weekender/summer car. I don't even have room to keep the spares for this one, let alone another car.
    • If I had "perfect R33 GTR" kinda money I would have bought one of the crazy expensive low mileage HJA cars, but I am sadly not that wealthy. I already picked this car out of various Skylines for sale locally, most of which were worse in some way. Only a few cars were actually better but also more expensive. In terms of buying a motor locally, I at least have the option to inspect it myself and juding the seller as a person, and used or freshly rebuilt engines that some people sell are actually ok price-wise. I knew the car was going to require work, but shit piled up real fast and I haven't even driven 1000km yet as the turbo started oiling like a bitch within a few weeks after I got the car.   I assume it wasn't actually me who cracked it, though there is no way to know when that crack formed and if the previous owner even knew it was there. Buying another 05U Block can be a gamble, yeah, but the cheapest PRP cast block is like twice or more money-wise, and billet is 3 or 3 times as much. For now I am most likely just keeping the current engine, as a rebuild or engine swap isn't happening right now. But I am seriously considering buying a second engine and selling mine in return. Might be a sweet deal at the end.
    • Hi all. I need some help buying the correct size banjo bolts for my 2860 turbos. Because whoever installed them tore up the original part, I ordered new ones of this kind, because I just figured these were the most leak-resistant option as I already had trouble with a shitty braided line. I need to know the thread size of the smaller left hole, that is the turbo oil feed connection. I found out so far that the turbo oil inlet apparently has a 7/16"-24 thread, but I cannot find any listing or description of the thread size on this line. I do not have the original bolts. I tried using the bolts that were in the turbos (the ones that were mounted with the shitty braided line) but they sit very loosely so they can't be the right thread. Means either these bolts are the wrong ones (how do they fit the turbo then? no clue) or the wraparound-lines have a different thread than the turbo oil feed itself. Help is appreciated, asking Nissan directly is obviously not going to work.
    • EDIT: PSA to whoever stumbles upon this thread. It is in fact a crack in the block that caused this concern. Just letting you know. In my case, a few cm long hairline crack going horizontally above the turbo oil feed. Classic RB shit I guess
×
×
  • Create New...