Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys just wondering when it comes to tuning the power fc will i require a wideband 02 sensor or will a 4 wire one do the job.... Like this one?

http://www.tweakit.net/shop/product_info.php?products_id=81

(will it fit r33 gtst?)

or will even the stock o2 sensor do?

Any ideas comments welcome.... do not have a clue when it comes to these o2 sensors and seems that they are hard to find even on the net.

Cheers

You need a wideband to tune the PowerFC. The "4 wire" O2 sensors are the narrowband type, just with an inbuilt heating element. Totally useless for tuning for anything but stoichiometric AFRs.

You need a wideband to tune the PowerFC. The "4 wire" O2 sensors are the narrowband type, just with an inbuilt heating element. Totally useless for tuning for anything but stoichiometric AFRs.

ok so does this mean that everyone that has had a power fc tuned needed to get an o2 sensor b4 they could get the tune?

anyone know where i can get a wideband from?

Edited by bygrave316
No. Noone has to get a wideband. Just take it to a tuner and he does all the tuning with his wideband. Done.

ok.... now i get it.... so they just remove yours and put in one of those ones connected to a meter.

ok so what would be the adavntage of replacing my old one with a 4 wire one? better if i was to hook up an air fuel gague or something?

let me clarify. when they tune your car they stick one up the exhaust pipe at the back and use a portable controller and guage to read and then tune your car. they keep the stock narrowband sensor in the exhaust dump pipe. they tune the car accordingly and then remove it when done. theres no need to replace your factory narrowband one unless it is broken and doesn't return anything useful. they have a lifespan of around 50,000k's ish. so it might be worthwhile just replacing it anyway. the stock 33 gtst sensor is a generic 3 wire sensor and you can use a ford el falcon sensor as its the same type and setup.

let me clarify. when they tune your car they stick one up the exhaust pipe at the back and use a portable controller and guage to read and then tune your car. they keep the stock narrowband sensor in the exhaust dump pipe. they tune the car accordingly and then remove it when done. theres no need to replace your factory narrowband one unless it is broken and doesn't return anything useful. they have a lifespan of around 50,000k's ish. so it might be worthwhile just replacing it anyway. the stock 33 gtst sensor is a generic 3 wire sensor and you can use a ford el falcon sensor as its the same type and setup.

ok so what is the benifit of getting a 4 wire one? or is there no benifit?

i wouldnt think there is one at all. im not even sure it would work with the stock ecu or powerfc being a different sensor type. and dont bother getting an af guage off the stock narrowband sensor it will be pointless and given you nothing useful

i wouldnt think there is one at all. im not even sure it would work with the stock ecu or powerfc being a different sensor type. and dont bother getting an af guage off the stock narrowband sensor it will be pointless and given you nothing useful

ok thanks for clearing it all up for me.... for a second there i was thinking i was going to have to go spend more $$$ on an o2 sensor

chears

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...