Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

He said ARE not ARC...

BTW, Richard of ARE at Brendale is a good customer of mine and his products are simply the best aviable on the market here in Australia.

cool, but look at the price difference .. especially since he is in the UK .. ARC is same price shipped ans the ARE is unshipped...

If you find your air temps are adversly affected or still aren't getting the result you want, have a look at this...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/OIL-COOLER-...639755922QQrdZ1

I got one of these from Ebay in the US for $75 AUD from an auction. Paid $145 AUD all up delivered by air mail to australia. Relocated your battery to the boot and this will fit nicely in its place. Keep trawling thru ebay you find all kinds of bargins. It will require a little fabrication work but considering your car I doubt you'll be afraid of that. These oil coolers retail for something like $900 USD and are purpose built for Nascar, mine was made by C & R radiators.

You can'd beat a water cooled oil system for consistant and controllable oil temps. Nascar do it for a reason.

Edited by GTST4Newbie

Na they flow really well, as the internal oil cooler is a plate style.

Check out this link... gives you an idea of the internal design.

http://www.crracing.com/custom_built/external_heat.shtml

Because it uses water as well the surface area for heat exchange can be greatly reduced while still achieving the same thermal efficency as a large air-oil cooler. Simular principal to anything you might have read on water-air intercooling.

Na they flow really well, as the internal oil cooler is a plate style.

Check out this link... gives you an idea of the internal design.

http://www.crracing.com/custom_built/external_heat.shtml

Because it uses water as well the surface area for heat exchange can be greatly reduced while still achieving the same thermal efficency as a large air-oil cooler. Simular principal to anything you might have read on water-air intercooling.

Do they need to be sat in airflow or could we mount it behind the headlight? They look a novel (to me) way to deal with oil temp problems. Very interesting :D

You can mount it in your boot if you don't mind running the plumbing to it.

So long as your main radiator gets sufficent enough air flow, your oil temps will be maintained around the 80-90 degree mark with the rest of your engine, which is where they should be.

Most oils begin to loose viscosity around 85-90 degrees, and are really down hill by 130 degrees. The additives in them burn etc and become abrasive, which is really bad....

I purchased mine for my VW, not for my skyline. As the VW is oil/air cooled, maintaining a constant oil temp is pretty important, but also hard to do when your engine is bored and stroked 800cc oversize and turbo charged. Water cooling makes engine temperatures a lot easier to manage.

I've mounted the oil cooler inside the car behind the passenger front seat on the floor (under the back seat, and out of sight). Water is electrically pumped through twin front mounted radiators. The electric pumps are controlled by the cars engine management.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...