Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey,

just wondering about the t66 turbo, and how'd they go on an rb25det. what modifications would need to be made, manifold, exhaust etc?

what power would be made on around say 16psi (for starters), and how much the it would cost to get one set up.

can they be made to spool up at around 3500 rpm.

anyone with t66's on there rb25det's would love to see ya results.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/13036-t66-turbos-on-rb25det/
Share on other sites

only reason i ask is because i figure bigga turbo+"less" boost= still big power. meaning dont have to boost as much for same results, but u get a little lag instead.

there was an rb30et with one and it made over 330rkw, but that was on around 22 psi. just wondered if many had them on rb25det's.

thanks.

if i was to say that on 16psi a t66 would make around 280rwkw, with other mods such as fuel system, intercooler, exhaust, and ecu, would i be close to the mark. or would it be more like 240rwkw.

the thing is, i have a dream. and in this dream i want to run 11's, and when running 11's ......

I did the exact set up on my last engine and it started to spool up about 3700-4000 rpm and then by 4001 rpm she hit full boost(20+psi) and three lanes from where u were, when u last looked at the rd, and the time it take to go from 4001-7500rpm is 0.000001 of a sec.

Ever looked at something like a T04R or T51R from HKS? Big power, not as much lag as a T66. The T04R kit is a medium-large HKS single turbo capable of 730+rwhp (Dynojet / 860 flywheel horsepower) on high boost. The JUN s15 has one and pushes out big power, so if it works well on SR20's, it should work just as well on an RB :D

TO4R specs

T04R Turbine wheel dimensions are 74.2mm/64.7mm

T04R compressor A/R is .70

Available T04R turbine A/R's are .81, .84, .96 and 1.15

HKS turbo inducer / exducer sizes

HKS T04R 66.7mm/84mm

HKS T51R KAI 70.3mm/94mm

HKS T51R SPL 76.5mm/102.2mm

hey,

thanks for all the info. i am not to sure about which way i want to go. Ball bearing is much more expensive, and dont really cant justify spending into the $3000 mark on just a turbo. The large garret items however can be gotten for around the $2000 mark. but a t04e might be another option.

hungry6 wat sorta power were you making at the treads, and wat sort of times would a turbo like this be good for. 1250 kg car. i know theres heaps of other variables, but did u manage a good time.

thanks

any more input welcome from other guys with big turbo setups

hey,

i sorta thinking away from the t66 idea. 4000rpm spool sounds a bit boring for street use.

was thinking of getting a turbo which can still make around the wsame power, but just have a smaller housing.

is that how it works?

if not how can i make the same sort of power but have boost coming on a hell of a lot earlier.

is this possible or is it a compromise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...