Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if anyone has had experience with getting their engine 'carbon cleaned' - ie: take it to a mechanic and they run some sota cleaner through the motor whist its running. Its not the same as squirting a can of carby cleaner thru the motor.. or is it??

Can anyone confrim this is worth doing?? I've heard large carbon buildups on the pistons can cause engines to ping etc...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131100-carbon-cleaning/
Share on other sites

I can't imagine it being required for a modern engine and didn't even know people still did it !

Way back in the old days we used to use brake fluid to de-carbon ;) Worked really well but I wouldn't suggest doing it nowdays :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131100-carbon-cleaning/#findComment-2424531
Share on other sites

We used to do that one too. I knew a guy who worked for a dealership many years ago that tried the water de-carbon trick on a customer's supra and got it wrong ( bent 2 rods, lol ).

The brake fluid trick was for severe cases and just to clarify, we didn't run brake fluid through the engine while it was running :D We used to soak the pistons / cylinders for about 2 full days which lifted the carbon build-up. Won't go into the whole procedure because it's illegal and has damage potential if done incorrectly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131100-carbon-cleaning/#findComment-2424609
Share on other sites

They use ATF fluid in rotors to de-carbon the apex seals if it has been sitting for a while. Not done whilst running though.

Mafia was starting a gb with water/methanol injection kits not long ago, reduces pinging and also cleans the internals of the engine. Could consider something like that... would also prevent the problem in the future.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131100-carbon-cleaning/#findComment-2426158
Share on other sites

I used to work for the Shell mechanical garages, and we had proper carbon cleaning machines that use high pressure and a special wynns product called "CARBON BLASTER". The results of b4 and after were massive, wish i had pictures of all the carbon buildup that actually comes out when the machine sucks all the old crap out.

Not entirely sure how the machine actually works, but the results from actually getting ur engine properly cleaned with a specialist machine vs just a can of carby cleaner, throttle body cleaner etc is 2 different leagues. Im not sure on whether u should get it done but we have done it from hsv's to bmw's but only if we thought the car would really benefit from it.

From memory it cost $120 - 150 depending on quantity of product used and takes 30mins - 1hr to do. Ask around and see if your mechanic actually has a proper carbon cleaning machine. not a can of carby cleaner!

Cheers Pete (BOOSTA)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131100-carbon-cleaning/#findComment-2441078
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...