Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i dont think the ECU goes into close loop (ie uses o2 sensor) during idling

from the doccos i've read for the RB30 ECCS, only above 2500rpm and only at crusing speed. the lights on the ECCS start to flash lean/rich/okay/dead when in closeloop. the RB20 eccs should work similarly from what i've seen

when i had my HD clutch installed they accidently damaged my 02 sensor, i'm assuming this is the 02 sensor every1's talking about.

the 1 thats hard to reach!

nyways at idling, it wud drop in revs all the way down to 0, till the car almost stalls, then it wud bounce up and down from 0 to 1,000 rpm

i've read somewhere you can 'clean' with high temperature like a butane torch or something.... dunno if that would work. o2 sensors have a limited life span and if they rattle they are dead (small chemical plate inside has broken)

if a car is hunting at idling then i dont think its the o2 sensor, but the Auxillary Air Control valve maybe instead (you can disconnect this to see if there is any difference)

yeah there are several ways...

find the wire for the O2 sensor going to your ECU and put a + probe from multimeter on it. put the - probe to the chasis and drive your car. it should vary between 0-1volts. if it stays at 0v its dead

or you can use an Air Fuel meter (various kit forms from Jaycar) and if its 0 then its dead

on the RB30 ECCS if you have the car warm temp, running @ ~2500rpm (no throttle switch in idle), diag mode OFF then the GREEN light should flash/stay on at least if both lights off continously then O2 dead. it may be similar for the RB20 ECCS since most of the software looks similar

That's really weird. My O2 sensor is totally dead (ie reads 0V permanently), but I've got great economy. I've got a SAFC though, which I suppose works off the AFM.

Can anyone tell me when the ECU uses the AFM and when it uses the O2 sensor? Or is it always using both?

think it uses AFM at all times - because it requires 'LOAD' from the VQ map which is measured by AFM to calculate at least the ignition timing and perhaps air/fuel ratio maps (this uses a variation from 14.7 stioch ratio when in different parts of the rev/load range)

matt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...