Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys/girls (pfft) ...

anyways I have an R34 GTT and when i block my BOV i get a maximum of 5psi, and it takes longer to build unless its a light LIFT-OFF. (which is why i wanted to remove it, better response).

But i want my full 10-12psi (stock turbo).

I've blocked my lines from the bov, and the boost controller im using is a Turbosmart dual-stage (amazing, never had 1 spike issue with it)

anyway, i just want my full boost without my BOV in use.

help :P

post-12759-1158564655.jpg

Edited by illusiVe
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134817-r34-block-bov-low-boost/
Share on other sites

lol... Your not blocking off the bov.

By blocking off the boost feed you are allowing it to open easily as there is no pressure on the opposite of the diaphragm, Pressure on the opposite side of the diaphragm equalises the pressure and holds the bov shut under boost.

the best way to block it off is to remove it and put a plate over the top of the hole. then you need to block the return line.

and by blocking it off you won't get better respnse. in fact on gear changes you will have MUCH more lag as the air in the cooler piping hits the closed butterfly, turns around and heads back towards the turbo, and hits the compressor, slowing it down.

the bov lets the air out and keeps the air flowing in the 1 direction.

and at 12psi you wouldn't be losing any boost pressure. if you are want a bit more response you can block up the recirculation hole in the bov. just take the bov off, countersink a hole so that the head of the screw will be flush with the bov. then put a wood screw in.

but you aren't getting the same response. you are only getting 5psi. try the same thing without a boost controller, just off the wastegate (so its 5psi) and see which is better. and you said in your first post that it takes longer to build boost unless it is only light throttle lift off.

yes it takes time to vent, but since your current setup is holding the bov open the air is just flowing straight out. but once you step on the gas again and it buils up enough pressure to open the bov you would lose power, as the turbo keeps working harder and harder, but the boost doesn't rise.

Edited by mad082

last time i take friends advice for 'removing a bov'

my poor turbo :P

so if i do something like this (as i understand it from your post)

will remove bov physically and car will run 12 psi with no leakage :(?

not shown in the pic, i'd also have to block the original hose from the throttle body/intake area thingie :(?

post-12759-1158584172.jpg

Edited by illusiVe

You only need to throw a plate on the cross over pipe then bolt the bov back over the top of it. Be sure to use gaskets.

But...... Don't fiddle.. Just leave it.

The stock bov is there for a couple of reasons, improve part throttle drivability and to aid turbo life.

in illusive's post, just cut a bit of sheet metal to size and block it where the yellow label is. Don't worry about disconnecting any of the other stuff or plugging anything else.

If you block it at the flange then no air will recirculate, no matter what the diaphragm does. Leave everything else connected so you have no air leaks, and presto.. blocked BOV and it looks stock :)

thanks for confirmation, yer last thing u want to do is put a piece of metal in your engine by someone just saying 'do this' and being unsure.

when everyone was basically saying the same thing, i gave it a shot and it works awesumz.

my noBov mod is proudly sponsored by 1 wasted can of coke.

can of coke ????

hahahaha oh man I wanna see a pic of that !! :)

Anyways best way to block off the bov is to take out the black rubber hosing that connects the bov to the return pipe, go to the local hardware and buy 3/4' (from memory) rubber stoppers for chair legs haha and attach to the bov and the return pipe and do up the clamps and your done.....

I only done this to check if the bov was faulty as I seemed to be loosing boost somewhere...and I was right too I was losing boost but it wasnt from the bov....dont recommend leaving it blocked off for extended periods of time though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...