Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey gurls n gurls, i need sum help

i put my car on the dyno about 4 months ago at unigroup. it made 181.5 kw as seen by the printout. as you can see, the afr remains at 14 until 5500 rpm and then drops to 13 by 6000rpm and then to 12 by 6500 and onwards. Back then i had cat back exhuast, pod, front mount and close to 1 bar of boost.

Now i have a split dump/front pipe, high flow cat, fuel pump. last week i installed a power fc and got it tuned by hit man. As you can see it only made 175 kws? i was like wtf? he reckons sumthings really faarked cos it shud be closer to 190-200rwks. he recons maybe my cats melted cos my pump died and i was running really lean, however if u look at my afr now theyre really low...max is 12.5 but it drops away significantly.

i dunno, do u think i shud increase my afr to what it was before. cos even though it was 14, it dropped to 12 on high load and im thinking maybe thats safe?

newways my power is low and boost comes on slowly sumtimes, yet mid-range is now better? on low throttle, if i hold it at a certain point, i get this slight detontation. i dunno, any suggestions?

both graphs are there

cheers, anton

post-29367-1161416292.jpg

post-29367-1161416442.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139647-lack-of-power/
Share on other sites

the closer you get to 10:1 afr, the safer it gets

the reason it may have become richer is because of the extra airflow caused by the dump and cat, combined with the added fuel flow of the aftermarket pump.

What you get is a richer mixture causing less power (cos before you were lean)

someone please explain this better than me...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139647-lack-of-power/#findComment-2602936
Share on other sites

just noticed your intake temp was 54 degrees. that may have something to do with it.

also i'd say your tune isn't the best. the graph is a bit crappy, but that could also be due to the fact you are losing quite a bit of boost.

and if it was run in 4th gear, they are backing off at about 6000rpm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139647-lack-of-power/#findComment-2603024
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...