Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Still need a few cars like 33 and 34GTRs, first post for what is needed still. Also post if you want it after small car sunday or another weekend. Will get out and see if i can find some good spots and post pics.

i recon we got plenty of cars if every1 turns up that has put there hand up ...

im easy for what weekend i just dont want to be out late if its the weekend of scs due to my daughter comming home that weekend and ill probably have to get nanny to pick her up but she will want me

Took these pics at henley tonight around 8pm, so i think that around 6pm should be good for sunset shots, on SCS after the show and shine.

Anyone who wants to come let me know, will PM everyone in next couple of days, need to find out if heslo is getting his mate and if everyone wants to try and get HPI or Hot4s to come out.

post-23924-1162206916.jpg

post-23924-1162206940.jpg

post-23924-1162206969.jpg

post-23924-1162206984.jpg

dang and circle work is soo much fun

isnt that wot a beach is for

wot about maslins :laugh:

lol.. I grew up down south with Moana and Silversands beach at my disposal.

Went to the extent of chipping in with another 2 mates and bought a cheap old Galant, used it as a little rally car. Awesome fun and experience and ended up throwing a rod. :)

Took these pics at henley tonight around 8pm, so i think that around 6pm should be good for sunset shots, on SCS after the show and shine.

Anyone who wants to come let me know, will PM everyone in next couple of days, need to find out if heslo is getting his mate and if everyone wants to try and get HPI or Hot4s to come out.

Try to grab a tripod or something to sit the camera on then change the shutter/iso speed. You can grab some awesome night shots that way.

If it throws the white balance out be sure to set it manually,.

I took these two shots on a cappy HP 735 3.2mp Camera. Shutter speed at night makes for some very nice pictures. A good SLR also makes a hell of a difference. My sister is a professional photographer and the pictures her Digital SLR takes are simply awesome. You really see how the average camera loses the crisp realistic look of a photo.

post-382-1162207547.jpg

post-382-1162207552.jpg

so gts33t i take it you have a plan for the day

where not all gunna be there @ the end of scs deciding where we should go as i really dont want it to take too long which i can see now it will i think sat evening would be a better time... but thats my personal preferance

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...