Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well it was announced last meeting (18/10/2006) that WSID will soon be starting the off street meets on both wednesday and friday nights.

The first week of this will be Wed 1/11/06 and 3/11/06.

Wednesdays:

6pm-10pm

Burnouts at 9pm

$15 spectate

$45 competitor entry

Fridays:

6pm-Midnight

No burnouts

$20 spectate

Think its still $45 to compete dont quote me on that.

Hopefully this will bring back the more serious non-fulltime drivers like the 100's of Pac cars hiding in Sydney garages and plenty more 9sec v8's. Also having the event on friday night will allow people from Canberra->Bathurst->Newcastle to attend because they can knockoff work early and not have to worry about being home in time for an early start the next morning.

I'll be going to both Wed+Fri nite for the first few weeks to scope it all out although no doubt Friday nights will be the nite to go.

haha...see you there Ben I haven't been to wsid for months...Friday night racing has been needed for a while. It makes sense really. Allowing group 3 & 4 cars to race means plenty of quick cars, not just the 15 sec cars.

It's a 4 week trial period every Friday in Nov. from 5pm-Midnight

No ET limit, all group 3 & 4 cars allowed along with any other street registered cars; the only conditions are that you must run a muffler (ie 95db track reding) and meet regular street meet rules.

Nothing mentioned as yet i guess it will be a wait and see exercise.

The problem with having an "over 12sec" wed nite and "under 12sec" friday nite is the wed nites would get zero crowd coz nobody wants to see billy bob race his mums BA.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...