Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In the process of uploading 100pics i took today :sick:

I want to say a big congratulations to everyone involved in makiing this even hapen. It went off and we had heaps of interest (thanks to being soo close to the dyno) so great job guys :sick:, lets hope we can build on it and make next years bigger and better!

P.S Anna please delete this ghey picture, i was obviously not ready when u took it :sick:

gheypicez5.th.jpg

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In the process of uploading 100pics i took today :(

I want to say a big congratulations to everyone involved in makiing this even hapen. It went off and we had heaps of interest (thanks to being soo close to the dyno) so great job guys :sick:, lets hope we can build on it and make next years bigger and better!

P.S Anna please delete this ghey picture, i was obviously not ready when u took it :sick:

gheypicez5.th.jpg

whats wrong with that pic..... :sick:

In the process of uploading 100pics i took today :(

I want to say a big congratulations to everyone involved in makiing this even hapen. It went off and we had heaps of interest (thanks to being soo close to the dyno) so great job guys :sick: , lets hope we can build on it and make next years bigger and better!

P.S Anna please delete this ghey picture, i was obviously not ready when u took it :sick:

gheypicez5.th.jpg

are you the dude who looks miserable? :sick:

yeah it was a great event. i had loads of fun.....good to see dave having a perv on promo chicks every two secs.....nice TITs too.....

thanx everyone for their effort, especially when i was not there....also, thanx chris for being there for two days playing non-stop music...

and good to meet everyone

oh nearly forgot to say....anna, andy and ben, thank you guys for the cleaning products and effort....my car looks so much better now, hope it doesnt rain....

have i missed anyone?

Well done to SAU - looked great!

How funny that they put u guys right next to our club - High Rollers - 8 out of our 10 cars were Skylines, so both together it was a Skyline fest!

There was actually 3 Godzilla cars as part of High Rollers, all R32 GTR's - Mark Jacobsens's (966hp @ all four!) Easy St & Hyjakd (my car was the chameleon green R33)

Look forward to seeing some of u guys around in the future!

Cheers

Anita

thanks anita :rofl: ur display looked pretty sweet aswell :(

must say, if it werent for you guys agreeing to to go half and half on the spaces, it wouldnt have looked as good, big thanks for that :rofl:

i had to leave early on sat so i missed the dyno action. what cars from ur display ran and what did they make?

yeah it did look better 4 both of us to go halves with the spaces, so worked out best 4 everyone in the end - no dramas...

um dyno figures i'll do my best to remember...

Mark Jacobsens GTR - 800+awhp??? (fresh engine from the 966hp run) - trophies for 6cy 4wd & k/w per litre

83ATN RX7 - 444rwhp on pump - trophy for biggest hp rotory

Easy Street GTR - 500+awhp??? (potentially much more in this car indeed)

Damo's GTR - 350+awhp??? - relatively few mods here really

20WNU yellow 32 GTS-t - 314rwhp

My R33 GTS-t - 453rwhp on 18psi

not bad numbers indeed

i didnt realise ur car was a gts-t until i had a close look at the engine bay :(

are we going to see you guys on the SCC (skyline charity cruise, formerly MSC) on 3rd december?

What HP did you make Shane?

car wasnt ready, only sent the CAD file to the laser cutter for the adapter plate last thursday. injectors arrive tomorrow so i'll be all set to put the engine in when i get the plate back! :laugh: oh and gotta get the sump fiddled with, heading down to millennium motorsport tomorrow

0r033 GTR 33 250 KW at all 4wheels with 14 PSI of boost >_<

dunno what the HP conversion is >_<

u didnt put ur car on the dyno though did u ben?

anita's car would absolutely smash urs, and its 'only' a gts-t :P

u didnt put ur car on the dyno though did u ben?

anita's car would absolutely smash urs, and its 'only' a gts-t :P

There was a few 'Only' Gtst's around the place that would give it a red hot go :blink:

Oh and I am gonna join in on the pointless number slinging

969JQU 255rwkw 16 psi AND ONLY ONE TURBO >_< >_<

And ben..your dyno graph showed 244kw, wich is 330hp :blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 😃  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
×
×
  • Create New...