Jump to content
SAU Community

Gcg Or Kkr Turbo?


Recommended Posts

Guest Rotary20B
in all fairness you can't really say the kkr turbos are bad.

sure they'll work and give you some good performance but the fact of the matter is they won't match the performance and reliability of a gcg bb turbo

So the KKRs aren't reliable?

I have read of a few good reports about them, but wanted to get peoples first hand experience.

As for performance, they are actually better than the GCG which is the reason I am looking at them. apart from them being non bb that is, which doesn't bother me one bit.

Relibility is an issue though if you know something.

theres 5 main things that come to mind when we talk about bb vs non bb

1) price difference

ball bearing units are often more expensive. they are expensive for the obvious reason, they are better. but presumably it comes down to balancing the unit possibly different and/or using different equipment / skill in the engineer lab to build bb units

2) spool up or "response"

with non ball bearing it will take longer to spool up

theres a graph floating a round somewhere of bb vs non bb spool up

i think it was about 2 second different in turbine speed response for bb vs non bb.

3) failure rate

another issue of non bb is theres a chance of bearing failure when the oil feed is cut off and the bearings are hot. that is if you go for a hard run, and instantly cut the engine off / oil feed. bb have a greater tolerance to heat, whereas the plain / journal brothers do not and can fail. ie if you are doing a run and say stall the car or have to turn it off, say cops pull u over or something.

4) oil feed changes

for plain / journal bearings the oil feed needs to be modified to flow more oil into the bearings. they need more oil to keep the flowing and lubed up. bb need less oil so they have a restrictor in the oil line by default. with the journal / plain brothers you need to usually remove the restrictor and or make the oil line bigger / better to flow more oil.

5) oil lifespan

as the bearings need more oil flow into them, they go through more oil, that is more oil is pushed through the bearing core to keep it happy and lubed. so your engine oil is "used" at a faster / higher rate than the same engine with a bb turbo unit. im not sure what this means in terms of oil life span in your engine but say bb oil change are every 10,000 you may be to changing it every 7000 k's (guesstimation) if using journal / plain bearing units

so there are a few considerations to take into account. hopefully some of the info ive provided may help you make a descision as there are pro's and con's for both bb units and non bb units. we notice that oem manufacturers (well at least we think they do) prefer bb units over non bb units for things such as reliability, longer life span, better oil lifespan, better response and less km's between rebuilding them. if any of the info ive provied is wrong please let me know and ill correct it. the more we all learn the better it is for all of us

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...