Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heya Guys,

Well a little over 3 months ago now I imported my dream car, a Series 1 R33 GTS-t to be the first owner in Australia :O However we found not long after that there were a few engine issues that were quite common in the RB25's, that needed to be sorted out.

So after a few weeks of saving the pennies my mechanic and I sat down and brainstormed the best plan of action. It resulted in the following:

Week 1:

Engine was stripped and removed from the car to reveal the following...

post-30395-1163984362.jpg

post-30395-1163984373.jpg

As you can see the rings have been obliterated.

What we feared was scoring of the bore, which would result in boring out and a hone, which was more cost we didn't want, but....

post-30395-1163984390.jpg

Chamber 1, plenty of scores there...too many to ignore.

Week 2:

The block was sent away to the engine shop to get machined. Bored out.

We were awaiting the order for the Arias forged pistons to arrive so the machining of the bore could be guaged properly. These have now arrived!!

post-30395-1163984448.jpg

Forgies.

post-30395-1163984427.jpg

Metal Head Gasket.

Well, So far so good. The block arrives back today from the engine shop...so we can get building again.

I will update the post as it unfolds :rofl:

Cheers guys,

Sam.

Edited by Sambo33gtst
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143954-documentation-of-my-rebuild/
Share on other sites

hehe thanks guys.

What i meant about the common problem was the loss of compression in pot number 1. Sorry about the confusion.

Unsure about the crank actually Col, will have to get back to you on that one.

Haha yeh she is in tatters atm hey matty, ah well it looks like this thursday she will be back out :happy: I wanna see borat god dammit. Did u go to the big screen?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...