Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i agree with scathing on this one.

its not about backpressure, backpressure by definition is a restriction and causes a loss of power.

Here's a response I prepared earlier.

And the "pulse tuning reversion" is also called "scavenging".

Here's a response I prepared earlier.

And the "pulse tuning reversion" is also called "scavenging".

i have some disagreements with what you have written in that post.

you have noted that narrower pipes have less turbulent airflow then a larger one for low amounts of airflow. while this is true, and it has to do with gas velocities, more turbulent airflow doesnt necessarily mean more backpressure as you have stated.

another member in that post also noted that a high velocity exhaust system is desirable. the misconception here is that gas speed is desirable, where it is infact a side affect of other factors. laminar flow occurs when there is enough gas speed in a given pipe. for example 100cfm through a 2" pipe might give turbulent flow, but when we reach say 200cfm flow for the same 2" pipe it may give us laminar flow. this increase in mass of gas (keeping temp variable constant) going through the same pipe increases the gas velocities, and the reason for the increase of velocities is because of pressure buildup within the pipe, and this pressure buildup is back pressure.

if we increase the pipe to 3" and pump the same 200cfm through the pipe, gas velocities will decrease, which means less pressure build up, and less backpressure - and at the same time the flow may be turbulent again as its slower moving. this is why the bigger is better applies to turbo cars for less backpressure and if you want minimum backpressure for NA's - gas dynamics dont change, you still go for bigger. but of course if your not getting any backpressure at 2.5", increasing to 3" wont do anything for you.

that instance of turbulent flow is not an issue, its mearly a side affect. turbulence becomes a problem when it exists in parts of a laminar flowing system. for example you have a 2" pipe flowing 200cfm in a laminar fashion, the pipe has a flap inside it half way down the pipe. this flap is an obstruction to flow and causes turbulence around that area. the introduction of turbulence in laminar flow is what causes a loss of flow, not when the flow is turbulent simply because of a lack of gas speed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...